Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Workplace Stress Is Declining. Does OSHA Notice?

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Workplace Stress Is Declining. Does OSHA Notice?

Article excerpt

The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is moving ahead with an ambitious ergonomics standard designed to deal with the huge array of "muscular-skeletal disorders," or MSDs, that workers often experience. OSHA estimates the cost to exceed $4 billion a year, substantially beyond the economic burden of any previous OSHA directive. The agency says the annual benefits will be far greater (about $9 billion). But is all this really necessary?

The coverage of the proposed ergonomics standard would be extensive. It takes OSHA 50 pages to cite the rules, 250 pages to explain the rules, and more than 1,000 pages to enumerate the 100 or more injury categories that OSHA describes. Moreover, the standard's intricate requirements would be triggered by a single impairment of one employee at a factory or other facility, and the "impairment" may have only a minimal connection to the person's job functions.

The Small Business Administration, which like OSHA is a part of the executive branch of the federal government, estimates the cost of the ergonomics standard to be much higher - between $11 billion and $63 billion annually. Private estimates are higher still.

The development of the ergonomics standard provides an interesting case study of how regulators develop their role. Initially, the standard was supposed to deal with the problem of repetitive-motion disorders - such as those related to typing or similar repetitive motions.

However, while developing the standard, OSHA learned that the number of repeated trauma cases peaked at less than 350,000 in 1994, and declined to about 250,000 in 1998 (less than 5 percent of the occupational injuries and illnesses reported for the year). Only those unfamiliar with the ways of government would expect OSHA to drop the matter just because the problem was being solved without its intervention.

Instead, OSHA broadened the scope of the proposed ergonomics standard to include "overexertion" that results from bending, climbing, crawling, reaching, and twisting.

However, as noted by Ron Bird of the Employment Policy Foundation, the causes of "bodily reaction" injuries have few clear links to ergonomic hazards (which supposedly arise from using equipment and other "things"). …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.