Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Why the Worker Pessimism?

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Why the Worker Pessimism?

Article excerpt

The rising feeling of insecurity among American workers seems to be a great anomaly in a period of unusually low unemployment. Sadly, this may be, at least in part, an example of the unintended consequences of government regulation.

Recent surveys show that many more workers - in absolute numbers and as a portion of the workforce - fear they will lose their jobs today than at the height of the 1981 recession. Back then, the unemployment rate was above 10 percent, while in recent months the rate has hovered around a low of 4 percent. Moreover, the average length of time employees have been holding their jobs (about 3-1/2 years) hasn't been declining during this period; the overall trend has been rather stable.

So what accounts for the rising feeling of job insecurity on the part of so many American workers?

Nobody knows for sure, but I believe that, in good measure, this sad situation is an artifact of well-intended labor legislation. In 1988, Congress passed the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. Among its many other provisions, the WARN Act requires employers generally (as in most regulatory legislation, there are numerous exceptions and special cases) to provide 60 days advance notice of layoffs involving 500 or more workers.

Under WARN, the penalties for failure to meet the notification requirements are severe. An employer who is in violation is liable to pay each "aggrieved employee" back pay and benefits for the full period of the violation, up to 60 days. In addition, an employer who fails to provide the required layoff notice to the local government is subject to a penalty not to exceed $500 for each day of violation.

As a result, it is not surprising that companies laying off 500 or more workers make sure that they provide sufficient notice. In some cases, the number of people actually laid off has been lower than the announcement (AT&T provided a dramatic example of that during the early 1990s). But, in view of the potential penalties, it is clear why employers would rather overestimate than underestimate the bad news.

As in so much other legislation passed by Congress, there is one glaring loophole: "Regular federal, state, and local government" agencies are generally exempt. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.