Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Sizing Up Global Integration ; the More Globalized Nations Boast Greater Income Equality, Not Less

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Sizing Up Global Integration ; the More Globalized Nations Boast Greater Income Equality, Not Less

Article excerpt

Globalization has become the new century's most abused buzzword. Advocates and detractors alike bend its meaning to fit their arguments.

In truth, globalization entails a dense web of cross-border relationships that range from the very evident - one example is the exotic fruits found in supermarkets - to the very subtle, such as the opinions that become conventional wisdom as a result of the unprecedented boom in human interaction.

One aspect frequently missed in the debates about globalization is its measurement: How extensive is globalization? Which countries are the most globalized? The least? And why?

Those rare instances in which anyone attempts to measure globalization typically rely on data concerning international trade and investment flows, to the exclusion of other aspects of global integration.

To fill this gap, Foreign Policy magazine teamed up with A.T. Kearney to create the Globalization Index, which employs indicators spanning information technology, finance, trade, travel, and personal communication to gauge levels of global integration in 50 key developed countries and emerging markets.

The results of this exercise offer a fascinating three- dimensional glimpse of the nature, speed, and scope of globalization. Looking closely at the details, we find strong evidence that some of the most widely held notions surrounding global integration require reexamination. Consider just a few of our observations:

Globalization and income disparity need not go together. The world's most global countries boast greater income equality than their less-global counterparts.

Even among developing countries, those that are more integrated with their neighbors (such as Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic), tend to have more equitable patterns of income distribution than those that are not as well integrated (including Argentina, China, and Russia).

This finding offers a counterpoint to those who argue that developing countries are poor and unequal because of globalization, suggesting instead that history, economic policies, welfare programs, and education policies may play an important role in shaping income distribution.

More-globalized nations are freer and less corrupt. With few exceptions, countries that score well on the Globalization Index enjoy greater political freedom, as measured by the annual Freedom House survey of civil liberties and political rights. Similarly, a comparison of the index's rankings with Transparency International's survey of perceived corruption worldwide suggests that public officials in more-global countries are less corrupt than their counterparts in closed economies. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.