Enron May Push Regulatory Wave across Free Enterprise

Article excerpt

Enron Corp.'s failure has smudged the public image of capitalism.

It has left Wall Street "with a couple of black eyes," says William Freund, a former chief economist for the New York Stock Exchange.

Critics talk of "crony capitalism." Corporate executives are being seen more often as rascals, not the touted heroes of the 1990s New Economy.

Observers suspect that the deregulation movement of recent decades could be replaced by a re-regulation era. Washington might move back partway toward the strong business and financial regulation that Franklin Delano Roosevelt won in reaction to the Great Depression and the business scandals of the early 1930s. At the least, deregulation may experience a lengthy pause.

The Amercan corporate system has usually been ranked as having transparent and honest accounting. It was believed to suffer from relatively little inside dealing when compared to many other rich nations. Many shareholders now wonder if those standards were weakened in the go-go 1990s.

Enron is even raising old questions about the fairness of the free-enterprise system. Its high rewards for top executives and losses for the rank and file raised eyebrows.

Conservatives, perhaps even more than liberals, are troubled by the Enron scandal. Some see Enron as an enemy of capitalism, damaging the free market.

"Being pro-business does not include condoning ... abuses which, if left unattended, would bring down the very free-market capitalist system that we cherish," notes Lawrence Kudlow, a Wall Street economic consultant. He credits this system, the rule of law, and "presumably" inhabitants of strong moral character with enabling the US to be "the most prosperous nation on the planet."

Many liberals would welcome better controls over business.

"It will be good in the long run, but messy along the way," says Alan Blinder, a former Federal Reserve governor and now an economist at Princeton University in New Jersey.

"It is going to lead to all sorts of new regulation - and properly so," predicts Alfred Kahn, an economics professor at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., who helped deregulate the trucking and airline industries years ago.

The 1930s reforms included creation of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the passage by Congress of the Public Utility Holding Company Act.

The newborn SEC required regular reporting of corporate news, including annual reports, and audited earnings statements. The utility act prohibited the pyramiding of holding companies to obscure business realities, much like Enron's multiple off-the- books entities.

Such reforms "may have saved American capitalism," says Richard Hirsh, a historian at Virginia Tech, in Blacksburg, Va. They established a fairer and more level playing field, giving investors confidence in the firms in which they put money.

Jerry Taylor, director of natural resource studies at the Cato Institute in Washington, charges Enron with being "a pro" at "regulatory opportunism. …

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.