Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Court Hears Death Penalty Case ; Is Death Fair for Low-IQ Defendants?

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Court Hears Death Penalty Case ; Is Death Fair for Low-IQ Defendants?

Article excerpt

Until last year, Daryl Atkins was just another convict on Virginia's death row.

But then, his lawyers filed an appeal asking the US Supreme Court to overturn his death sentence. They made the request not because their client is innocent of any involvement in the 1996 murder for which he was convicted, but because he may not be intelligent enough to fully appreciate the depth of his wrongdoing and the severity of the punishment he faces.

With an IQ of 59, Mr. Atkins has been diagnosed as being mildly mentally retarded. Prosecutors in Virginia dispute that diagnosis and insist he fully understands the difference between right and wrong.

Today, Atkins's case will be heard before the high court, where the justices are being asked to decide whether capital punishment for convicted murderers who are mentally retarded violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

It is potentially a major decision. A victory for Atkins could establish a constitutional precedent that would block the death penalty whenever a convicted murderer is diagnosed as being mentally retarded (regardless of the individual facts of a case). Instead, the maximum penalty such defendants would face is life in prison without parole.

It is unclear how many of the nation's 3,700 death-row inmates might ultimately be designated as mentally retarded.

"Mental retardation profoundly limits a defendant's personal culpability for his or her actions," writes Robert Lee in Atkins's brief to the justices. Mr. Lee also argues that evolving standards of decency in the US have resulted in the emergence of a national consensus against execution of the mentally retarded.

Lawyers for the state of Virginia counter that mentally retarded individuals do not all possess the same level of intellectual ability. Many have the mental capacity to plan, premeditate, and deliberate with specific intent to kill, they say.

In the crime that led to Atkins's murder conviction, he and an associate, William Jones, abducted a US Air Force airman named Eric Nesbitt from the parking lot of a convenience store in Hampton, Va., in August 1996.

At gunpoint, they took $60 out of Mr. Nesbitt's wallet, then drove him in his own truck to the automated teller machine at his bank, where they forced him to withdraw another $200. Then they drove him to a remote location where he begged for his life. He was shot eight times. The two men stole Nesbitt's truck and left him beside the road, where he died.

A jury found that Atkins was the triggerman and sentenced him to death. Mr. Jones, who testified against Atkins as part of a deal with prosecutors, received a sentence of life in prison. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.