Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

It's Impolite to Ask a Lady Her Age ; One of the Most Famous Pieces of Ancient Greek Art May Be a Recent Swiss Fake

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

It's Impolite to Ask a Lady Her Age ; One of the Most Famous Pieces of Ancient Greek Art May Be a Recent Swiss Fake

Article excerpt

Everything that is wrong and right about archeological interpretation and its often subjective motives rests within a 16- centimeter-tall statuette called the Snake Goddess. Long regarded as the most precious artifact of 16th-century BC Minoan art, she has minded her own business for the past 84 years in hallowed residence at Boston's Museum of Fine Arts. But the snake-handling goddess's origin - her archaeological "findspot" - remains unverified.

Questions over her origin commenced almost from the beginning in 1914 when curator Lacey Caskey announced the statue's arrival from Crete in either a cigar box or a soap tin for a bargain price of $950.

With the publication of this thorough and devastating deconstruction by Kenneth Lapatin, president of the Boston Society of the Archaeological Institute of America, one must conclude that the Bronze Age beauty is not only a fake, but, more revealing, has been used to perpetuate an "idealized past."

Consensus has been reached, however, as to the Snake Goddess's beauty: In her chryselephantine elegance of delicately carved gold and ivory, the lady is a looker. Tongue-flickering serpents entwine around her outstretched arms, while she cuts a sensuous figure in a "wide skirt with multiple flounces or tiers, a belt encircling her narrow waist ... a tight-fitting short-sleeved bodice or jacket cut so low as to expose her ample breasts, one of which retains a golden nipple."

But it's her face - damaged on the left side either by centuries of wear or a forger's acid bath to create the impression of wear - that captures art historians' hearts. The lips pout, the eyes are deep-set with drilled pupils, and her countenance is summarized as "modern," that is, as independent of the restrictive patriarchal bondage of the ancient world.

Yet, Lapatin writes, these facial features are important clues that point to, if not a forged piece of art, perhaps "something in between, pastiches of ancient artifacts reworked ... to make them more appealing to contemporary viewers and buyers." After all, "eyes with drilled pupils and canthi ... do not appear in ancient statuary before the second century AD."

This mystery has one major suspect: Sir John Evans (1851-1941), a wealthy English archaeologist and mastermind behind the excavation of the Palace of Minos in the late-19th century at Knossos in Crete. Lapatin accuses him of creating a false context for everything Minoan. Indeed, his multivolume "The Palace of Minos" reveals his motives. Evans places King Minos's society of bull leapers, snake handlers, and ivory artists on the same rarefied cultural plane as "ancient Egypt, Anatolia, and Mesopotamia ... a starting-point and the earliest stage in the highway of European civilization. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.