Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

The Democratic Retreat on Sept. 11

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

The Democratic Retreat on Sept. 11

Article excerpt

First came harsh Democratic attacks on the president for the handling of intelligence in the months before Sept. 11. Then, the following day, came the angry response from the president and those close to him in the administration. And then, on the Sunday talk shows, there was a decided softening of the Democratic attacks.

The next morning I was at the Monitor breakfast, where Democratic activist James Carville followed his party's line of retreat.

Mr. Carville was telling us that no Democrat really had blamed the president for letting the public down on Sept. 11. He hadn't heard any such words, and he challenged the assembled journalists to cite words that specifically accused the president.

Nobody spoke up - because maybe there weren't specific words of accusation. But certainly Sen. Hillary Clinton came close to blaming Bush when, on the Senate floor, she spoke of the "questions being raised by constituents" because of the New York Post headline, "Bush Knew."

"The president knew what?" she asked. "My constituents would like to know the answer to that and many other questions...." Here she said she wasn't blaming the president, just asking questions.

But if this wasn't blame it was in that direction. It was clearly saying the president must explain his actions relating to Sept. 11.

But the president's angry reply, seconded on a number of talk shows by the vice president, caused Bush's attackers to change their tune - particularly since the public had quickly (according to polls) come to the president's side. When George W. assured Americans he had done all he could with the intelligence at hand, two things happened: (1) The public, already strongly behind him, jumped to his side, and (2) this same public turned with anger on his accusers.

By the time Carville arrived at breakfast, the Democrats had felt the heat from people who were incensed that their president, whom they trusted, had suffered such an attack in time of war. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.