Now the wooing, enticing, cajoling - even coercing - begins.
Just as Turkey has faced intense pressure from the United States
to allow the use of its territory for a possible war with Iraq, a
half-dozen countries on the United Nations Security Council are
about to begin feeling like the rope in a tug of war between two
The six, normally second- or third-tier powers on the diplomatic
stage - Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Guinea, Mexico, and Pakistan - are
the undecided Council members who are likely to determine the fate
of two competing visions for Iraq.
On the one hand, the US, backed by Britain and Spain, will seek
the six countries' support for a new UN resolution introduced Monday
that would place an international imprimatur on the use of force to
disarm Iraq. But also on Monday, France, Germany, and Russia began
circulating in the 15-member Council their own proposal for
enhancing weapons inspections as a way to put off war.
What comes now, officials and experts say, is at least two weeks
of hard diplomatic sell as the US tries to convince a majority of
nine Council members that weapons inspections have not worked. The
new resolution is not expected to be voted on until perhaps mid-
March - after chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix updates the
Council March 7.
Both sides in the battle will seek to isolate the opposing
proposal by winning over as many undecided Council members - the UN
equivalent of swing votes - as possible.
The objective, experts say, is to win the crucial battle for
international public opinion.
"It's not a United Nations blessing of US action that we need.
It's the support of domestic and international opinion, and going
through the UN is the way we get that," says Ivo Daalder, a foreign-
policy expert at the Brookings Institution here.
If the US is to fight a war with any country at its side, it will
be only with a new UN resolution, Mr. Daalder adds. "[British Prime
Minister] Tony Blair needs it for his domestic audience ... so does
Spain, so does Italy," he says - and that means a Council majority
of nine must be won over.
The White House acknowledges that while the US holds to its view
that authorization for war is contained in previous resolutions -
including 1441, which passed the Council unanimously last November -
the new resolution is a concession to allies such as Britain that
face strong antiwar majorities at home.
President Bush's national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice,
told journalists Monday that "for a number of our closest allies
[seeking a second resolution] was an important step to take. …