Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Court Test of Gay Rights vs. Traditional Values ; Landmark Sodomy Case Holds Implications for Privacy Rights and Definition of Marriage

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Court Test of Gay Rights vs. Traditional Values ; Landmark Sodomy Case Holds Implications for Privacy Rights and Definition of Marriage

Article excerpt

Responding to a report of a possible gunman, Houston police burst into an apartment and discover, instead, two men engaged in a sex act.

The activity is consensual, and within the privacy of one of the men's own home. Nonetheless, the two are charged with violating Texas' homosexual-conduct statute that outlaws "deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex."

Both men, John Lawrence and Tyron Garner, are held overnight in jail and fined $200.

The matter might have ended there, but the men decided to appeal their case. They argued that Texas was violating the constitutional rights of gays by prosecuting them for engaging in behaviors that are not illegal under Texas law if practiced by heterosexual couples.

In a potential landmark case, the US Supreme Court will examine Wednesday whether the Texas law violates the equal protection and privacy rights of homosexuals, or whether the law is, instead, a legitimate attempt by the state to uphold its view of sexual morality, family values, and traditional marriage.

Supporters of the law say there is no fundamental right in the Constitution to engage in certain homosexual acts. To strike down the Texas law, they say, could create such a right and lay the legal groundwork for recognition of same-sex marriages.

Opponents of the law say among the most fundamental of rights guaranteed in the Constitution is the right to be let alone. The government does not enjoy the unfettered power to intrude into the most intimate and private aspects of what happens in American bedrooms, they say.

"What we are asking for is to not have the police prosecute you for choosing one particular way to express your love for someone else in private," says Ruth Harlow of Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, a gay-rights legal group representing the two men.

Some groups promoting family values and traditional marriage see in the case the thin edge of a wedge that could undermine favored treatment of male-female marriage by state lawmakers.

"[This case] could have broad implications not just for the 13 states that have sodomy laws, but for the marriage laws in every state," says Joshua Baker of the Marriage Law Project at Catholic University Law School.

In addition to Texas, three other states - Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma - make it a crime for gays to engage in sodomy. Nine other states make those same acts illegal for both gays and heterosexuals. The states are: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah, and Virginia. …

Author Advanced search

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.