Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

The Price of Winning the War and Keeping the Peace

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

The Price of Winning the War and Keeping the Peace

Article excerpt

The United States seems to be well prepared for war in Iraq, but it isn't clear how well prepared it is for the peace that follows.

Inside the Bush administration, there are conflicting views about what Iraqi peacekeeping and nation rebuilding would cost. The American people are not getting good answers to their questions about what the price would be, how long it would take, and who, besides the United States, would help.

The troops are massed, weapons are in place, and military men are suggesting that after a short, sharp campaign fought with amazing new weapons, the liberating army may be at the gates of Baghdad in about 12 days.

Presumably at that stage Saddam Hussein's departure from the scene will either have taken place or be imminent. First priorities would be securing Iraq's oil fields, seizing key Hussein generals and henchmen before they can get away or do harm, and feeding and sheltering thousands of civilian victims of the war, along with captured prisoners.

What happens after that is less clear, but it is critical. For while eliminating Mr. Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction are important, an even greater goal is bringing freedom to Iraq's people and nurturing democracy. That can send a stream of fresh, liberating air across the repressed and backward Arab lands of Islam.

President Bush laid out this vision when he spoke at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington last week. "A new regime in Iraq would serve as a dramatic and inspiring example for other nations in the region," he declared. "It is presumptuous and insulting to suggest that the one-fifth of humanity that is Muslim is somehow untouched by the most basic aspirations of life." But he also warned that bringing stability and unity to a free Iraq will not be easy. That is a considerable understatement.

A few days earlier, about a hundred officials from key Washington agencies met behind closed doors to review plans for postwar Iraq. Spearheading the planning is the Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance in the Pentagon. The Defense Department's Under-secretary of Defense for Policy, Douglas Feith, suggested that reconstruction would require the involvement of other countries and the United Nations, but said no decisions have been made about how this would be done.

Actually, there is not even certainty about how large a force the US would have to maintain. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.