The Quality of Mercy

Article excerpt

The top UN official for humanitarian aid, Jan Egeland, has offered an apology for implying in the early days of the tsunami disaster that rich countries, especially the US, were being "stingy" in their relief donations. Now, with over $2 billion in official aid and millions more in private giving going to Asia's victims, Mr. Egeland says, "International compassion has never been like this."

Indeed, the scale of mercy has few precedents. Charities, especially the Red Cross, report record donations. The US Navy has launched one of its largest humanitarian operations, providing vital services such as fresh water. On Thursday, world leaders will meet in Jakarta to pledge more aid and further coordinate relief and redevelopment efforts.

It's inevitable, however, that criticisms will appear about the quality of such massive giving. Donors are wary of scams or the level of overhead costs. Governments are faulted for inadequate or slow responses, or for posturing more than planning. Critics cite Indian politicians, for example, who flew to the tsunami site mainly for photo-ops.

After a tragedy of this scale, the biggest complaint may be that the world's attention span will be too short. To counter that, British Prime Minister Tony Blair says this global catastrophe will require "months, if not years, of work." Bush also made a long-term commitment.

UN officials like Mr. Egeland note inconsistencies in the amount of rich-nation giving. …


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.