By sidestepping the Senate and naming controversial nuclear-arms
diplomat John Bolton as ambassador to the United Nations during a
congressional recess, President Bush has thrilled the Republican
Party's right while stymieing moderates of both parties holding out
for a more conciliatory choice.
The appointment ends nearly five months of political battling and
stalemate over a nomination that the president insisted was "the
right man at the right time" for the key diplomatic post. By
appointing Mr. Bolton, Mr. Bush sends to the UN a longtime stinging
critic of the international organization just as the United States
is pressing for significant reforms in how the UN works.
Drawing on the difficulties it is facing in rebuilding Iraq, the
Bush administration has concluded that the UN is a desirable and
even indispensable partner in such international efforts as
elections preparation, education, and economic development. But it
has also focused on the UN-administered oil-for-food program - which
became a pool of corruption while allowing Saddam Hussein to divert
millions in oil revenues - viewing it as an example of the deep
reforms the UN needs if it is to be effective.
The question now is whether Bolton, who has caused even US allies
like the British to express private concerns in the past about his
diplomatic skills, will be impaired in his ability to press the US
case for UN reform.
Bolton will unavoidably start out from a weakened position,
experts in the UN's workings say, just by virtue of the high-
profile controversy that has swirled around him. But they add that
more important for his long-term effectiveness will be the tone he
sets in working with other ambassadors and countries.
"There's no question it's not a desirable way to start this job,"
says Edward Luck, a UN expert at Columbia University in New York.
"He comes with a reputation as a UN basher and he comes without
Senate confirmation, so he already has two strikes against him."
But Mr. Luck, who has worked on past UN reform efforts, says that
Bolton also has important strengths for the job, including his
"intelligence" and knowledge of how the UN works. "If he can undergo
something of a reform himself, if he recognizes he needs to be less
confrontational, less of a loner and more of a builder, then I think
he can do it."
In announcing the recess appointment, Bush noted that the US has
gone more than six months without a permanent UN ambassador - since
the last ambassador, former Sen. John Danforth, resigned. He said
the post is "too important to leave vacant any longer, especially
during a war and a vital debate about UN reform."
Standing with Bush at the White House, Bolton appeared to
pointedly address critics who said he had often overstepped orders
in the past by pursuing his own foreign-policy agenda. …