Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

A Chasm Grows in 'Flat' World ; Labor Day Assessment: Globalization Has Not Eased Global Income Inequality

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

A Chasm Grows in 'Flat' World ; Labor Day Assessment: Globalization Has Not Eased Global Income Inequality

Article excerpt

At a meeting 11 days ago in Chicago, representatives from 900 unions worldwide coalesced around a common idea: Turn up the pressure on Wal-Mart globally to boost pay and benefits.

The move, by the federation known as Union Network International, encapsulates an anxiety shared by millions of workers, especially in advanced and middle-income nations. As corporations mine an expanding global labor market for the maximum efficiencies, will many workers be left behind?

If we live in an increasingly "flat" world where commerce and jobs can flow easily from Berlin to Beijing and New York to New Delhi, the world remains far from flat in income terms. As Americans celebrate Labor Day this weekend, enormous rich-poor income gaps continue to strain relations and resources. Indeed, one lesson may be that globalization isn't the great leveler of poverty that some hope.

But it doesn't appear to be the great destroyer of rich-country wealth, either.

Thus, for advanced nations, income gaps can look comforting. Overall, wages aren't plunging, even if some workers have been hit hard. But globally, inequality is worrisome.

"Unquestionably the average Chinese is incomparably better off," says economist James Galbraith at the University of Texas. "India is also vastly different. But in other major parts of the world, particularly Africa, the situation is extremely bleak and has been getting worse."

The challenge is surfacing simultaneously at the United Nations and the World Bank. A recent UN study finds much of the world trapped in deepening inequality and will convene next month to focus on ways to radically reduce poverty. Also next month, in its world development report for 2006, the World Bank will focus on "equity and development."

If the problem of inequality is a thorny one, it is hardly new. In part, inequality has arisen as a symptom of progress, especially since 1800, as some nations have advanced far faster than others. For many economists, the way to help the most people is to promote rising living standards for everyone. In other words, focus on economic growth, not mere equality.

Yet equality, too, is important, a growing number say. More- equal income distribution within nations is seen by many as aiding political stability (both internally and internationally). It can broaden the base of consumers, fueling new economic growth. It could even reduce migration pressures of people leaving poorer countries for richer ones.

More important, it can mean more fulfillment of human potential and less suffering.

On average, per capita incomes have been rising globally over the past couple of decades, according to UN statistics. Yet about half the world's population is still living on less than $2 a day, defined by many as a key poverty line, according to the Population Reference Bureau. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.