From the beginning of the Iraq war, Americans have been inundated
with news, photos, and video footage of the conflict. They show a
country under siege, a dangerous and inhospitable place. But one
artist, New York painter Steve Mumford, wasn't convinced that chaos
was the whole story. He made four visits to Iraq between April 2003
and October 2004, attaching himself to United States military units,
and deploying pen and brush to document what he saw.
The results of his 10-1/2 months in Iraq - a remarkable series of
pen-and-ink drawings and lively watercolors, along with his stories -
have been collected in a new book, "Baghdad Journal: An Artist in
Occupied Iraq" (Drawn & Quarterly Books, Montreal).
Mr. Mumford says his goal was not to take sides, but to provide a
visual record of the time he spent and the people he met - including
both soldiers and Iraqi citizens.
Combat art has a long tradition. In the days of Lord Nelson and
British dominance at sea, painters depicted daring naval victories
based solely on survivors' tales. During the American Civil War,
Winslow Homer covered major skirmishes as well as the daily life of
soldiers for Harper's Weekly. In World War II, the US armed forces
hired more than 100 military and civilian artists to capture the war
Mumford "combat artist" as shorthand to explain his presence and
to persuade commanders to let him go on missions with troops.
On his first trip in April 2003, armed with only a press pass
from the online art journal artnet.com, Mumford paid his own way to
Kuwait City and caught a ride into Iraq with two French journalists.
On that trip and subsequent visits, he sought out smaller bases
where he could stay with soldiers and record their doings with
minimal Army red tape.
"One thing in my favor," Mumford says in a phone interview, "is
that most people in the military are familiar with the concept of
'combat artist.' " The real point, for him, was "to go to the
source. That's my mantra," he says: to get out of the studio and
into the world. He is strongly against what he calls the "distancing
of contemporary art."
But painting pictures in a war zone? Mumford says that while it
was a challenge to pull out a drawing pad each time, no one
questioned why he was there. He writes that people took for granted
the fact that history was being made, so why wouldn't an artist be
Mumford did not see much combat during his four trips, but
security was clearly deteriorating by the time of his last visit in
October 2004. The units with which he traveled were mostly guarding
installations, searching for insurgents and weapons, and trying to
sort out problems the Iraqis brought to them. Unlike news media,
Mumford was not obliged to cover the latest bloody attack. But that
didn't shield him from hostile fire and dangerous situations, which
he describes in the book.
At least one commander told him, "Follow the soldiers'
instructions, because they'll put their lives at risk to save you."
But no one tried to censor his drawings or discourage him from going
out on missions.
In a village or cafe, the sight of Mumford with a sketch pad
attracted attention. Iraqis would crowd around him as he drew,
pointing and making comments in a friendly way. "Iraqi men are just
crazy to have their pictures taken or painted," Mumford says. The
women, in line with Muslim customs, did not approach him. Rarely did
anyone object to being drawn - except a suspected insurgent who
strongly protested, the artist says. …