Democrat Robert Byrd of West Virginia became the longest serving
US senator in American history Monday - with several colleagues just
behind him. First elected in 1958, Monday marked his 17,327th day in
Four years off Senator Byrd's pace, Sens. Edward Kennedy (D) of
Massachusetts and Daniel Inouye (D) of Hawaii have each served more
than 43 years in the Senate. Sen. Joseph Biden (D) of Delaware,
elected in 1972 a few weeks shy of the constitutional age of 30,
could eventually lap them all.
But there are few in line to take Byrd's place as a steady, often
eloquent, defender of the Senate itself - the role that has most
distinguished his career.
The reason? The number of lawmakers steeped in the history of the
institutions in which they serve is on the ebb. Congressional
scholars say that's because senators now see the office as a
stepping-stone. In recent years, many of the most effective
legislators have opted for jobs in the private sector.
"Many senators correctly conclude that the Senate is no longer
the launching pad for the presidency that it once was," says Ross
Baker, a political scientist at Rutgers University in New Brunswick.
Many senators also complain that the job involves too much
"It's not as desirable a job as it once was," says Julian
Zelizer, a congressional historian at Boston University.
Lots of annotations in red pencil
That hasn't stopped Byrd.
From the Bush doctrine of preemptive strikes to the line-item
veto and balanced-budget amendment, he has balked at moves that
would rein in constitutional powers he sees as reserved to the
"Senator Byrd is one of the few remaining institutionalists,"
says Louis Fisher, a constitutional law specialist with the Library
of Congress. "He was very consistent right from the start. He never
Byrd learned the Senate the old-fashioned way: by a lifelong
study of the chamber's arcane rules and procedures. His copy of
"Riddick's Senate Procedure" - the textbook for how the Senate works
- is heavily annotated in red pencil. When there's too much
annotation to read the text, he starts over with a fresh copy. He
reads dictionaries the same way.
In May 1993, he launched a series of lectures on the Senate floor
in a bid to defeat the line-item veto, later ruled unconstitutional
by the Supreme Court. The lectures, delivered without notes, are
riffs on how the decision to hand over the powers of the purse to a
strong chief executive would erode the authority of the US Senate -
just as it did with the Senate of the ancient Roman Republic. …