Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Letters to the Editor

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Letters to the Editor

Article excerpt

Why France and Germany are going 'easier' on Russia

Regarding your Aug. 15 editorial, "Europe's (dis)unity over Russia": The editorial suggests that France and Germany are going easy on Russia. In some ways, perhaps, but these issues have many dimensions.

France generates more than three quarters of its electricity through nuclear power, thereby reducing demand for Russian oil and gas. France is also the largest exporter of electricity. Furthermore, it has greatly improved the technology of nuclear- energy generation and exports the equipment and technology to many countries, including the United States.

Germany has been the center of wind power. It is also a major center of research into energy conservation.

The Europeans in general have huge taxes on gasoline, which also reduce the demand for Russia's gas and oil.

It would help a lot if America would follow the European leadership in many of these areas.

Richard Bruce Davis, Calif.

Regarding your recent editorial on Russia's invasion of Georgia: Georgia plays a minor and temporary role in the transport of oil for Russia, and certainly Russia had to know such an aggressive move would cool its trade relations with Europe, which has been its principal consumer of Russian oil.

I believe that Russia is thinking more strategically. Russia was, first and foremost, assessing NATO and the United States as to their resolve in reacting to Russian aggression. Supporting this are the recent remarks by Russian leadership, blaming the US for Russia's own aggression.

Dan Rieke Irvine, Calif.

Political contributions: legal corruption

Regarding the Aug. 15 article, "Lawmaker ethics. An oxymoron?" The article overlooks the major problem in Congress: political contributions. While lawmakers have tied themselves in knots adopting reforms that put distance between themselves and lobbyists, the pace of political fundraising has increased dramatically. So now the $50 lunch that these reforms prohibit me from buying for a member of Congress or his staff aide can be paid for legally by a $500 political contribution.

Moving efforts to influence public policy from the legislative to the political arena is the antithesis of reform. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.