Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Workers Run Home-Care Business Co-Op Promotes Improved Working Conditions by Blending Social and Occupational Ideals. CARETAKING

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Workers Run Home-Care Business Co-Op Promotes Improved Working Conditions by Blending Social and Occupational Ideals. CARETAKING

Article excerpt

TWELVE hours a day, three days a week, Christine Edey cares for a disabled man in a small apartment in the South Bronx.

The man was in a highway crash and has no use of his arms and legs. Ms. Edey assists with his daily routine and helps with the computer course he is taking at home (he taps the keys with a pencil in his mouth). As much as anything, she brings humanity to difficult and lonely hours. "We fight. We quarrel. We talk. We don't talk," she says.

At night, she walks the forbidding blocks to the subway that will take her home.

In one sense, Edey isn't that unusual. There are more than 90,000 home-care workers like her in New York City. They are mainly women, mainly black or Hispanic. They work primarily for private companies, at low pay and with little hope of advancement. Edey's company is different, however. The pay is top scale, with extra for hard cases like hers. The company strives to provide full-time work, which is rare in the field.

Most important, the company offers an opportunity to advance. Through a special program, Edey is on her way to becoming a full-fledged nurse.

There's a reason why the owners of Cooperative Home Care Associates (CHCA) take such an interest in their employees: The owners are the employees. Edey isn't just a home-care worker. She's also a member of the company board. She helps make decisions on conditions and pay, and how much the company will grow. This has given her a whole different perspective on what many consider unskilled, menial work. "The pay's not that great, but that's not the important thing," she says. "It's close-knit and family-like."

After a halting start five years ago, CHCA has done well enough to inspire similar enterprises in Boston; Oakland, Calif.; and Waterbury, Conn. It is part of a growing trend of helping the unemployed by helping them start their own businesses. (Though Edey herself previously worked in a hotel, 80 percent of CHCA's employees were on welfare before they joined the company.)

CHCA also represents a promising new way to blend the business side of home care with social ideals. "It was a bright ray of light in a system that didn't have many," says David Gould, a vice president at the United Hospital Fund in New York, an independent foundation that helped fund CHCA's start-up in 1984.

In the early 1980s, Rick Surpin, who started the home-care co-op, was working at the Community Service Society in New York, the oldest such institution in the United States.

Traditionally, the society had focused on social service and advocacy, but Mr. Surpin convinced the leadership to try a new direction: building enterprises that would employ the poor.

His first effort, a worker-owned construction company, had been unsuccessful. Home care looked more promising to him.

As most people know by now, Americans are growing older, and families that are fragmented and scattered no longer provide the help grandparents used to receive.

Home care really became a business in 1983, the year the Medicare system imposed fixed payments for various hospital procedures. Since longer stays no longer meant more compensation, hospitals started moving patients out the door as quickly as possible.

With federal and state funding, home care has burgeoned into a $7-billion-a-year industry, from almost nothing 10 years ago.

Since Medicare and Medicaid are based on a medical model, much of the money gets channeled through hospitals, which in turn contract out the work to private companies. Most of these operate as a cross between a temporary agency and McDonald's: low-wage jobs for mostly unskilled women in the urban labor force.

Surpin wanted to build a different kind of company, one that offered genuine opportunity, especially to women, while providing better care in the home. He says he thought it wasn't enough to simply fund minority-owned versions of the corporate care providers. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.