Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

White House, Congress Spar over Energy Policy

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

White House, Congress Spar over Energy Policy

Article excerpt

FOR the third time in 17 years, Middle East instability has energized Washington to talk about energy.

The current Persian Gulf crisis has spotlighted the importance of reducing growing United States dependence on imported oil for almost half of its energy.

From the White House to Capitol Hill everyone agrees a reduction should be undertaken now, as both President Bush and House majority leader Richard Gephardt (D) of Missouri indicated in their televised addresses this week.

But Congress and the president differ on what is most important to do this year. Congress wants to mandate conservation, the president seeks to encourage further oil and gas exploration. Each is skeptical of the other's approach. As a result, few changes in US energy policy may actually occur this year.

Proponents of change worry that the momentum for drawing up a farsighted policy may slip away when world tensions ebb, without the US having acted.

"We need an energy strategy for the future that ensures that we do not repeat the old mistakes of the early 1970s that saw America paralyzed by the inability to articulate long-term solutions," says Rep. Claudine Schneider (R) of Rhode Island, a longtime proponent of greater energy efficiency.

During the 1970s, the US dropped its efforts to make itself more nearly self-sufficient in energy when the Middle East political crises of that decade eased and relatively cheap imported oil flowed again.

The US imports one-third more oil now than it did when the first Middle East oil embargo crimped the international fuel line in 1973. Domestic production has declined, and the US would be importing even more today had it not doubled the energy efficiency of its cars during the 1970s and similarly raised the efficiency of new buildings and industries.

The most likely change this year stems from budgetary rather than energy considerations. "We may get an energy tax, strangely enough, as part of the budget deal" that Congress and the president have nearly completed, says political scientist Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution. If the tax is high enough, Americans might reduce their consumption of oil. They already burn one-fourth of what the world produces every year.

Other than a tax, the energy bill with the best prospects of passing Congress this year seeks to reduce oil consumption by forcing automakers to produce cars that go 40 percent farther on a gallon of gasoline. …

Author Advanced search


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.