Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Walsh Seeks to Restore Two Iran-Contra Convictions

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Walsh Seeks to Restore Two Iran-Contra Convictions

Article excerpt

INDEPENDENT counsel Lawrence Walsh has announced that he will seek to have two of the Iran-contra convictions against former Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North restored through what promises to be an exhaustive court-ordered process.

Mr. Walsh's action followed a US Supreme Court announcement on Tuesday that it had refused without comment to review a 2-1 decision of the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which set aside two of Mr. North's convictions and overturned the third on grounds he did not get a fair trial.

"We are, of course, disappointed that the Supreme Court would not take the North case at this time," Mr. Walsh said Tuesday. "We shall proceed with the remand in accordance with the decision of the court of appeals."

Walsh must conduct a witness by witness review of the 89 people who testified before the grand jury that indicted North and of the 32 trial witnesses to determine the content and sources of their testimony. If the court finds that any witness at trial used North's earlier immunized testimony before Congress in any fashion, and that the error was not "harmless," a new trial would be ordered.

If a witness at the grand jury stage is found to have used the immunized testimony in more than a "harmless" manner, the charges must be dropped.

The review of evidence ordered by the circuit court would "far exceed" North's 12-week 1989 trial in both "length and complexity," Walsh said.

North's lawyer, Brendan Sullivan, called the decision to continue the prosecution "outrageous" and accused Walsh of recanting on a private promise not to pursue charges if he lost at the Supreme Court.

Walsh spokeswoman Mary Belcher said there had been no agreement to drop the charges.

Walsh's Iran-contra prosecutions already have cost more than $25 million, she said.

Walsh's appeal centered on what steps the government must take to ensure that testimony compelled under a grant of immunity before congressional investigators is not later used at a criminal trial. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.