Arms Control Again Central US-Soviet Issue the Widely Anticipated Pause after START Has Been Cut Short; New Sets of Talks Expected

Article excerpt

JUST this summer it seemed big arms control negotiations were a thing of the past. The START treaty on long-range weaponry had taken nine years and hundreds of pages to complete.

The conventional wisdom was that both superpowers were too tired of haggling to bring up major new arms deals, at least for a while.

What a difference 12 days make. In barely more time than it takes to turn on TV lights, Presidents Bush and Gorbachev have between them decreed the virtual extinction of short-range tactical nuclear weaponry.

What's more, they've opened wide the door to talks on some of their most intractable nuclear differences, including the question of "star wars" strategic defenses.

Arms negotiators are not yet brushing off their pinstripes and making plane reservations for Geneva. But it's clear that for the near future arms control is once again playing a central role in the relationship between the United States and Soviet Union.

After a US delegation headed by Undersecretary of State Reginald Bartholomew returns Oct. 9 from its trip to Moscow, d expect a flurry of activity" in the halls of the Pentagon and State Department in preparation for new kinds of talks, says a knowledgeable US official.

Whether President Bush intended to set off such a chain of events when he announced his unilateral arms proposals on Sept. 27 isn't clear.

Gorbachev has embraced Bush's approach with enthusiasm, however. Undoubtedly one reason for the response is that Gorbachev knows that, like Bush, foreign affairs is an area in which he does best. And considering the political situation in Moscow, anything he can do to look forceful will be of immense help.

"One of the consequences of the Bush initiative is that it tends to elevate the status of Mr. Gorbachev and tends to elevate the status of the central government," says Max Kampleman, a chief US arms negotiator from 1985 to 1989.

Gorbachev's detailed response to Bush's proposals contains much agreement on the central question of tactical nuclear weapons. The Soviet leader pledged to unilaterally eliminate nuclear artillery and short-range rockets, as Bush had. This is no surprise, as the Soviets have long called for pulling tactical nuclear arms out of Europe.

But in the first of what might be called the "see you, and raise your bid" aspects of Gorbachev's outline, the Soviet leader also called on the US to negotiate a withdrawal of the last remaining kinds of tactical nukes: atom bombs for tactical fighter-bombers.

In his own speech Bush had made a point of emphasizing that NATO wanted to retain these weapons.

Until now tactical nuclear bombs have been a part of the NATO deterrent that was relatively uncontroversial with European publics. …

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.