Biodiversity Pact Ready for Ink at Earth Summit the Treaty Calls for Rich Nations to Help Fund Conservation Efforts of Developing Countries

Article excerpt

ALTHOUGH there are differences on details in the world's first biodiversity agreement, adopted here on Friday, there is a feeling among many nations that an important threshold has been crossed. For the first time, the world community has agreed to try to slow the extinction of plants and animals.

The treaty now goes to the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro next week for signature by heads of state. In view of reservations about the treaty voiced by the United States, France, Japan, and other nations, it is not yet clear how many nations will sign it.

Eleanor Savage, leader of the US delegation, called the agreement "a very mixed treaty {with} some serious flaws." She would not comment on whether the delegation would recommend that President Bush sign the document when he goes to Rio.

The French objected to a lack of specific lists of areas and species to protect. Japan wanted clearer terms on how money would be spent under the treaty.

But many delegates to the final round of negotiations here, from both rich and poor nations, welcomed the treaty.

"It's a small step in the right direction, but it's nothing like the giant leap forward we were hoping for," says Alistair Graham, an environmental lobbyist representing the World Wildlife Fund.

Mr. Graham says an estimated 100 species of plants and animals, including many micro- organisms, are disappearing from the earth every day. Many of them, he says, have never been studied, so their potential uses have not been discovered.

Graham says the treaty, if signed and ratified by the 30 countries required to make it go into effect, would give environmentalists stronger legal - and moral - arguments for preserving life of all forms on earth.

"You have a moral obligation not to operate in a way that will cause other species to become extinct. Other species have as much right to happiness and enjoyment on this planet as we do."

Kenyan ecologist Paul Chabeda, a delegate to the negotiations, says some plant species from the developing world have helped the developed nations. A Kenyan plant related to wheat was crossed with imported wheat in Kenya to develop a disease-resistant variety which is now widely used in Canada, he says.

The treaty adopted here is a two-way street. Developed nations have agreed to pay developing countries for conserving and controlling the use of their plants and animals. And developing nations are agreeing to let other countries purchase samples of those species to make products such as improved food crops, medicines, and cosmetics. …


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.