Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Foreign Policy Crises Test Domestic Policy President

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Foreign Policy Crises Test Domestic Policy President

Article excerpt

IT was a humbling week for President Clinton.

The man who was on a roll as the health-care president came face to face with another part of his job description: leader of the free world.

For the first time in Mr. Clinton's presidency, foreign policy crises dominated center stage for an entire week and put the president on the defensive about his limited foreign policy experience. The specter of foreign involvements past - Vietnam, Beirut, Panama - haunted his footsteps as he hurried back to Washington from California to consult with advisers on Somalia.

By week's end, he was fighting accusations in a letter on Somalia from 65 Republican members of Congress that an "indecisive and naive" approach to foreign policy could jeopardize America's international standing.

By contrast, the first crisis of the week - the political showdown in Moscow - put Clinton in a favorable light.

He stood by Russian President Boris Yeltsin early and decisively in his clash with hard-line members of parliament, a stand that proved correct after Mr. Yeltsin triumphed.

Even if the Russian crisis was an internal matter in which foreign opinion had little, if any, influence, Clinton could point to a record of relationship-building with the Russians that began early in his presidency. His Vancouver, British Columbia, summit with Yeltsin set a tone of cooperation between the two leaders, as have Defense Secretary Les Aspin's meetings with his Russian counterpart, Pavel Grachev.

Clinton has conducted United States-Russian relations "wisely," says Fred Ikle, a former top Defense Department official. "He hasn't made any apparent errors."

Somalia, however, is "probably the one error in foreign policy he has committed - namely, the excessive commitment to United Nations-governed decisionmaking," Mr. Ikle continues. This led to ill-considered support of the Security Council's decision to try to capture Somali warlord Mohamed Farah Aideed, he says. "They should have learned from the indictment of {Panamanian leader Manuel} Noriega," who proved nearly impossible to catch.

The American public had paid little attention to the fact that the Somalia action that began in November as a humanitarian mission was transformed in May into a broader, less-defined UN effort at nation-building.

But the sight of a dead US soldier being dragged through Mogadishu, after the killing Sunday of 12 US servicemen, brought the issue into American living rooms, congressional offices, and to the doorstep of the White House. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.