Roe V. Wade in Historical Context

Article excerpt

ABORTION liberals like to think that history supports loyalty to Roe v. Wade. History, they say, reveals that laws restricting abortion stem from 19th-century conceptions of gender inequality, religious extremism, indifference to poverty, and archaic public-health concerns.

Abortion conservatives, however, insist that they are in league with history. Conservatives trace the impulse to restrict abortions to advances in scientific understanding both of the origins of human life and of the potentially adverse effects of abortion on women.

Which version of history is correct? For most people, the problem with assessing the historical claims made by "pro choice" and "pro life" advocates is the scarcity of usable histories. For too long, the history of abortion regulation has remained buried in inaccessible archives and academic books.

A recent journalistic history by a Pulitzer Prize-winning author is subtly and credibly on the side of choice. Without partisanship, sensationalism, or overt value judgments, David J. Garrow's "Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade" details the people, places, and politics behind the legal struggle for reproductive rights in the United States.

Garrow concentrates on 20th-century efforts to undo 19th-century anti-birth-control legislation. His history chronicles how reforms designed to bring family-planning options to poor women broadened into reforms designed to promote sexual liberty and gender equality for all women. Reading Garrow's book, one can see the truth in the liberals' argument that American law originally opposed neither birth control nor abortion. Roe v. Wade has origins much deeper than the judicial activism and feminism of its own decade.

Although Roe v. Wade, the centerpiece of this book, hails from Texas, Garrow begins with a detailed account of birth-control-law reform movements in Connecticut. Some of the earliest and most restrictive abortion laws were enacted in Connecticut in 1879. The 1879 statute criminalized the use or prescription of all birth control devices.

The stringency of Connecticut law moved Yankee activists, physicians, and lawyers to forge the "right to privacy" doctrine eventually adopted by the Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut.

In a 1965 decision, Griswold established that a right to privacy residing in the "penumbra" of the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment invalidates state laws making it a crime for physicians to prescribe birth control methods or married couples to use them. A later Supreme Court case extended the right to unmarried persons. A young Texas lawyer named Sarah Weddington subsequently incorporated the "right to privacy" doctrine into arguments presented to the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade, the case that ended, perhaps forever in the US, blanket criminal bans on abortions.

The story Garrow tells is well worth the 900 plus pages he gives it. …

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.