Sentences of Trade Center Bombers Raise Questions of Judge's Methods

Article excerpt

UNITED States Federal Judge Kevin Duffy "threw the book" at the four convicted bombers of the World Trade Center.

But there may be some legal questions about how Judge Duffy calculated the weight of the book at the sentencing on Tuesday.

Legal experts are not sure if Judge Duffy's sentence of 240 years for each of the defendants will stand up to judicial review. Prior to the sentencing, Duffy said he had difficulty matching the federal guidelines on sentencing with the nature of this crime, in which six people died in the Feb. 26, 1993 bombing. The law did not permit a life sentence for any of the crimes committed in the case, but called for a sentence of "any term of years."

So Duffy calculated the sentence by figuring the life expectancy - 91 years - of each of the six people killed in the bombing and subtracting the number of years left in their lives. This came to a cumulative total of 180 years. He then added 30 years each on two further counts.

"My intention is you stay there {in prison} for the rest of your life," said Duffy, after sentencing one of the bombers.

But legal experts say that the federal guidelines were designed to avoid such sentencing. "I have never heard of calculating a sentence that way - it is certainly not in the federal sentencing guidelines," says Gerald Uelmen, dean of the Santa Clara University School of Law.

ROBERT Pugsley, a professor at the Southwestern University School of Law in Los Angeles, calls the sentence "one of the most unusual ways I have ever heard of developing a sentence. …


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.