Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor
Needed: `Green' Investment in South Africa Ecological Disasters Are a Legacy of Apartheid; Returning Multinationals Should Take the Lead in Planning for Environmental Protection Now
The dawning of democracy doesn't change the fact that huge areas of the country where blacks live are environmental disaster zones - a direct result of discriminatory economic development under apartheid.
Johannesburg's coal-burning power plant provides the city and white suburbs with the world's cheapest electricity, while children in the largely unelectrified black townships downwind breathe some of the world's most soot-filled air.
Overcrowding in the once-fertile former homelands - where 87 percent of the black population was forced onto reservations totaling 13 percent of the land - has caused deforestation, drought, and erosion. Now food crops barely grow. A British chemical company has dumped so much mercury in Natal's Umgeni River, the sole source of drinking water for thousands of blacks, that "you can almost tell the temperature of the water just by looking at it," says one observer.
Post-apartheid South Africa is yearning for foreign capital to help revitalize its flagging first-world white economy and jump-start its largely third-world black one.
ENCOURAGED by Mr. Mandela's promise of an attractive business climate, United States companies from Apple to ARCO are poised to seize South African markets. But few investors may consider how critical the environment is to the country's social welfare, especially since many blacks will live for years to come by farming, fishing, and wood gathering. "It would be sadly ironic if the new investment perpetuated our environmental and health problems, but this time under a democratic label," says Heeten Kalen, director of the South African Exchange Program on Environmental Justice. …