Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Can Reformers Make Subcontracts with America?

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Can Reformers Make Subcontracts with America?

Article excerpt

WORDS beginning with "R" are filling the air this spring: "R" for reform, as in welfare reform. "R" for reduced, as in reduced affirmative action. "R" for redefined, as in feminism redefined.

All three issues share a national mood of "R" for revision -- a feeling that the time has come for all accepted ideas to be reinvented, to use another popular "R" word.

Beyond the semantic connection -- sometimes hyped as "R" for revolution -- these three issues can be made to connect in more sober and thoughtful ways that could lead to new solutions.

When the subject is reforming welfare, politicians insist that cutting benefits and forcing recipients to work is the only way to end long-term dependency. Similarly, revisionists advocating a reduction in affirmative action argue that job quotas for minorities and women must go.

Now a third "R," redefining feminism, holds the potential to bring about equally dramatic social change by shifting the center of the women's movement. Last year Christina Hoff Sommers, author of "Who Stole Feminism?" (Simon & Schuster) blamed feminist leaders for alienating young women. This month a similar call for change comes from Rene Denfeld, the 28-year-old author of "The New Victorians" (Warner Books).

Ms. Denfeld charges that feminist leaders are "obsessed" with such things as date rape, censoring pornography, male-bashing, and "overthrowing a vague patriarchy." These "diversions," she says, fail to address the real needs of a new generation of women whose concerns include child care, parental leave, and job opportunities.

Opponents of change in all three areas worry that attempts to redress perceived imbalances in the current order could produce setbacks, possibly punishing the very people revisionists claim to want to help.

Yet if Denfeld, for example, does speak for a generation of disaffected young women, her arguments, if heeded, could produce wide-ranging benefits. Her call for a more representative, less doctrinaire women's movement raises an intriguing question: What would happen if the end of welfare-as-we-know-it and affirmative-action-as-we-know-it coincided with a shift away from feminism-as-we-know-it? …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.