Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Affirmative Action 101: What the Lingo Means

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Affirmative Action 101: What the Lingo Means

Article excerpt

WHAT is affirmative action, anyway? As the nation debates this highly charged issue, many terms and phrases are bandied about with a lack of precision: Quotas. Set-asides. Racial and gender preferences. Reverse discrimination.

Depending on the wording of questions, opinion polls either show strong support for affirmative action or call for its abolition.

To advocates, affirmative action means ensuring equal opportunity for all in education and employment. To critics, it can mean reverse discrimination, and for some beneficiaries, a feeling of stigma over being categorized as "disadvantaged" (read: inferior).

Further supercharging the debate is California's landmark decision last week to drop race- and gender-based admissions programs in the state university system and replace them with an admissions plan based on socio-economic factors. That may jeopardize $2.5 billion in federal aid to the university system. At the same time, some California officials are convinced that diversity can still be maintained, given that many blacks and Latinos come from disadvantaged backgrounds.

IN Washington, the battle lines were drawn by President Clinton's ringing endorsement of affirmative action last week. Senate majority leader and presidential candidate Bob Dole (R) of Kansas will introduce legislation this week to bar programs using quotas, set-asides, and other "preferences."

But what do these terms really mean?

A footnote in the 100-page presidential report on affirmative action, issued last week, sums up the problem: "'Affirmative action' enjoys no clear and widely shared definition."

An affirmative-action lexicon follows:

Quota. The report to the president doesn't define it, but according to Leroy Clark, a law professor at Catholic University in Washington, "a quota is a rigid numerical requirement, which is totally unresponsive to supply or merit." Critics of affirmative action say that some government programs, though not called quotas, are in effect quotas. "Bids for federal contracts are accepted only if 10 percent of the work is given to 'minority business enterprises.' This is a quota!" said Jorge Amselle, a policy analyst at the Center for Equal Opportunity.

Goals and timetables. This is how the federal government labels programs that aim for a specific participation by minorities and women. A contractor's failure to reach the "numerical benchmark" does not mean a failure to fulfill the executive order governing federal contractors. …

Author Advanced search


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.