Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Keeping Balance

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Keeping Balance

Article excerpt

Whether President Clinton likes it or not, the balanced- budget amendment will be back on the nation's agenda when the new Congress convenes in January.

The latest word from the administration is that Mr. Clinton doesn't like it any more than he did a year ago when his opposition helped rally the votes needed to narrowly defeat the amendment in the Senate.

But this is still a top item on the GOP agenda, and proponents can count on a couple of more votes in the Senate (they only failed by one last year). But before a balanced federal budget is constitutionally mandated, the nation will get a loud replay of the arguments for and against - and well it should. This measure is far from simple in its implications; it represents a turning point in American governance. Those who see the turning point as positive uphold the amendment as the only way to ensure fiscal responsibility in Washington. Without the requirement enshrined in basic law, they argue, Republicans and Democrats will continue to dance around true fiscal discipline, protecting their favorite programs and never making the hard choices needed to protect the country's economic future and keep government from absorbing too big a chunk of our financial resources. Those who see it as a turn toward disaster point to the need to preserve fiscal flexibility in order to respond to unforeseen emergencies, most notably recessions. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.