Newspaper article THE JOURNAL RECORD

Depositors Hope Illinois Ruling Fits Republic Class Action Suit / Debt Instruments as Securities

Newspaper article THE JOURNAL RECORD

Depositors Hope Illinois Ruling Fits Republic Class Action Suit / Debt Instruments as Securities

Article excerpt

Attorneys for depositors in Tulsa's failed Republic Bancorporation Inc. and related companies are hopeful that a ruling ma de last January in an Illinois U.S. district court will support their contention that debt instruments issued by the Republic entities were securities.

A class action suit filed in Sept. 1984 charges that Republic Bancorporation, Republic Financial Corp., Republic Trust and Savings Co., all of Tulsa, and Western Trust and Savings Co. of Oklahoma City, were engaged in the offering and sale of securities to the public.

Defendants in the suit are Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co., Sunbelt Bank and Trust Co. (formerly Republic Bank and Trust Co.), Republic Bancorporation and directors of the institutions in September1984. It alleges securities fraud, common law fraud, and aiding and abetting in the sale of unregistered securities.

The suit seeks actual damages of $72.2 million and exemplary damages of $722 million.

Counsel for the depositors are now working to prove that the notes of indebtedness sold by the Republic entities meet the criteria of securities laws, said Steven E. Smith of Smith, Hanson & Holmes, the firm which filed the suit.

The instruments in question are money market thrift certificates, negotiable rate term thrift certificates, savings trust certificates, savings plans, promissory notes and savings accounts.

In addition, Smith said, they must satisfy the court that the institutions had no regulatory protection besides securities laws, and were not insured.

The case of Banowitz vs. the State Exchange Bank of Culver, Ind., which was decided in Illinois on Jan. 18, is "closely analogous" to the Republic case, he noted.

In that case, the court held that instruments sold by a bank-related finance company were securities.

- Owners of the State Exchange Bank incorporated the State Exchange Finance Co., which made commercial loans to persons and corporations, according to the judge's opinion on the case. The shareholders of the bank were also shareholders of the finance company, and the two shared common officers and directors.

- Bank employees conducted all of the finance company's business, according to the opinion, and the finance company was located in the bank's main office building.

- The Republic class action suit charges that Republic Bancorporation owned Republic Financial, Republic Trust, and controlling interests in Republic Bank, later renamed Sunbelt Bank. Western Trust and Savings Co. of Oklahoma City was a branch of Republic Trust.

Furthermore, the class action cites "interlocking members of the board of directors," and notes that seven of the defendants served simultaneously on the boards of the holding company, the bank, Republic Financial and Republic Trust.

- State Exchange Finance Co. cited in the Banowitz case became insolvent and filed for Chapter 11 protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The court opinion cited insider transactions, transfer of faulty loans from the bank to the company and payment of cash by the company to the bank for certain real estate collateral. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.