Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Where Do Big Deficits Come from? James M. Buchanan Had an Idea

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Where Do Big Deficits Come from? James M. Buchanan Had an Idea

Article excerpt

Why do politicians act as they do? Specifically, why do they do things that dont seem to be in their constituents long-term interest, such as creating big deficits by authorizing lots of government spending without enough tax revenue to back it up?

James M. Buchanan devoted his life to trying to discover the answers to questions such as these. Mr. Buchanan, who died Wednesday, was a Nobel Prize-winning economist and leading advocate of a branch of his discipline called public choice theory.

Public choice theory holds that people who engage in public life, from politicians to bureaucrats to voters, behave pretty much as people do in private marketplaces. In other words, they act in narrow self-interest.

Its an unsentimental view of politics that goes like this: Politicians want to be reelected or make their parties powerful, so they offer up pork-barrel projects and entitlement goodies without imposing tax-derived pain to pay for them. Bureaucrats want to keep their jobs, so they facilitate the process. Voters want to keep the good times rolling, so they mark their ballots for the folks whove let the good times roll.

Liberals complain this theory discounts the ability of people to work together for the greater political good. Libertarians, on the other hand, saw him as a rock star someone whose academic work tended to confirm their view of the world.

The passing of Nobel laureate economist James M. Buchanan, one of the greatest proponents of limited government and free markets in the 20th century, leaves a giant void at a time when Western democracies are expanding the size and scope of the government and threatening the future of liberty, wrote James A. Dorn, a vice president of the libertarian Cato Institute, on Thursday.


Buchanan himself called his area of economic focus politics without romance. Its not groundbreaking to look at governance with a morally critical eye, of course: Thats what Machiavelli was all about. Buchanans contribution involved examining modern democratic government structures to see what factors pushed them to keep growing and growing, even under leaders supposedly committed to spending control. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.