Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Why the Feds Opted for a Sweeping Safety Review of Boeing 787

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Why the Feds Opted for a Sweeping Safety Review of Boeing 787

Article excerpt

A federal safety review of Boeing's 787 jetliner promises to bring added scrutiny to the pioneering but glitch-troubled airplane including inquiries into its heavy reliance on electronic controls and batteries.

For the flying public, that's probably a good thing.

Both the company and federal officials, as well as many outside aviation experts, say they believe the Boeing 787, dubbed the Dreamliner, is safe to fly. But with multiple and varied problems cropping up, including a recent fire during one plane's at-the- terminal transition between flights, the added layer of oversight may help to ensure that any flaws in design or manufacturing are found and fixed as promptly as possible.

The Federal Aviation Administration and US Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood launched the safety review Friday. The move, unusual for its sweeping scope, appears rooted in two facts: the 787's unfortunate series of first-year glitches and, second, the plane's unprecedented reliance on electric controls, such as using batteries in place of hydraulic systems.

"In light of a series of recent events, the FAA will conduct a comprehensive review of the Boeing 787 critical systems, including the design, manufacture and assembly," the FAA said in announcing the move.

Boeing announced its full cooperation with the review, but also emphasized the Dreamliner's successful safety record during its first year in service. "The airplane has logged 50,000 hours of flight and there are more than 150 flights occurring daily. Its in- service performance is on par with the industry's best-ever introduction into service the Boeing 777," the company said in a statement.

view_extra

Boeing said the regulatory certification process for the aircraft had been the "most robust and rigorous" in FAA history. But it acknowledged that "we have experienced in-service issues in recent months and we are never satisfied while there is room for improvement."

The federal agency joined Boeing in avowing that the plane is fit to fly, even as reviews by Boeing and the agency are under way. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.