Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Pentagon a Quiet Force in Gun-Control Debate. What Does It Want?

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Pentagon a Quiet Force in Gun-Control Debate. What Does It Want?

Article excerpt

Even as President Obama announced sweeping gun-control initiatives Wednesday, one little-discussed contingent has been quietly influencing the debate behind the scenes: current and former US military commanders.

US military officials have already been successful in reversing one initiative backed by the National Rifle Association (NRA) on Capitol Hill, which they worried could have a dangerous impact on US troops. Now, some prominent retired military officials are backing the administration's calls for "responsible gun ownership," including limits on military-style assault weapons.

Given their background, active and retired US military often have significant credibility in the gun-rights debate both in Congress and among the general public.

I do think retired military officers have a bit more weight than, no offense, the stereotypical knee-jerk New England liberals' do, says retired Col. Elspeth Cameron Ritchie, a psychiatrist and former mental health adviser to the Army surgeon general. Weve got credibility, weve worn the uniform, weve carried weapons. I like to go to the range and shoot were not anti-weapon, per se.

Earlier this month, retired Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who served as the commander of US forces in Afghanistan and before that as head of the elite Joint Special Operations Command, which oversees US Navy SEAL and Delta Force missions, said that there is no reason for most Americans to have military-grade weapons.

I spent a career carrying typically either a M16, and later a M4 carbine, he told MSNBC. And a M4 carbine fires a .223 caliber round which is 5.56 millimeters at about 3,000 feet per second. When it hits a human body, the effects are devastating. Its designed to do that. Thats what our soldiers ought to carry.

view_extra

He added, I personally don't think there's any need for that kind of weaponry on the streets and particularly around the schools in America. I believe that we've got to take a serious look I understand everybody's desire to have whatever they want but we have to protect our children and our police and we have to protect our population. And I think we have to take a very mature look at that. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.