Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other top Israeli
leaders remained mum a day after President Barack Obama's surprise
announcement he would seek congressional approval for a proposed
punitive strike on Syria. But their silence today is not out of
The stakes are high for the Jewish state as Congress prepares to
debate an act of war, going beyond the immediate Syrian civil war to
a possible regional showdown with Iran over its nuclear program.
There was widespread disappointment in Israel at the mixed signal
sent by a president who, on the one hand made a strong moral
argument for intervention in Syria over chemical weapons usage, and
at the same time backed away to place the fate of such a decision in
the hands of legislators.
"The Iranians are laughing... and the Syrians are celebrating
their triumph," said one Israeli official, who asked not be named.
"It's impossible for a massacre with weapons of mass destruction to
go unpunished. It's a moral issue. This is something that must be
immediately rejected, punished and deterred by the international
community. If not, the message to other dictatorships that hold WMD
is that you can use them with impunity.''
Israel fears that the hesitation will erode US deterrence in the
region because the president appears hesitant to act after defining
chemical weapons use by the Assad regime as a "red line" and after a
week of rising expectations of an attack.
Failure to heed Mr. Obama's call to action would undermine
Israeli confidence that the US will make good on Mr. Obama's
assurance that "all options are on the table'' to prevent Iran from
getting a nuclear weapon, and increase the worry here that at the
moment of truth the Jewish state will be on its own.
A year ago, Mr. Netanyahu said that Iran was quickly approaching
the ability to create its own weapon. He has repeatedly expressed
concern that US-led diplomatic effort to convince Iran to stop
uranium enrichment will be exploited by Iran to buy time and build a
weapon before force can be used.
"Anything that the US as a superpower does in the Middle East has
wider implications, because it affects how it is viewed," says Shomo
Brom, a former Israeli military planner and a fellow at the
Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University. "If
there is an impression that under no circumstances will the US use
military power against states, then it will probably effect how Iran
Danny Gillerman, a former Israeli ambassador to the UN who has
dovish views on the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, was more
blunt, saying that aggressive words by the president and Secretary
of State John Kerry were not backed up with action.
"We are witnessing in the recent days an international diplomatic
fiasco that recall the dark days of Jimmy Carter," he said in an
interview with Israel Radio. …