Newspaper article International Herald Tribune

Beware of Faulty Intelligence

Newspaper article International Herald Tribune

Beware of Faulty Intelligence

Article excerpt

In watching Iran's nuclear project, even a slight intelligence gaffe could have an outcome of historic proportions.

In January 2007, Israeli intelligence officials were horrified by information acquired when Mossad agents broke into the hotel room of a senior Syrian official in London and downloaded the contents of his laptop. The pilfered files revealed that Syria, aided by North Korea, was building a nuclear reactor that could produce an atomic bomb.

Until then, according to military intelligence officials, Israeli intelligence thought Syria had no nuclear program. But that was because Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, had set up a parallel and separate system of command and control for building the reactor. The discovery caused a panic in Israel, and grave concern in Washington, which had relied heavily on Israel's assurances that it knew everything about Syria.

By the time the reactor was discovered, it was almost ready to become operational. Deeming it too late for diplomatic action, Israel asked the Americans to attack the facility that spring. President George W. Bush refused, so Israel went ahead on its own, destroying the reactor in a bombing raid on Sept. 6, 2007, and risking a war.

The lesson in humility that intelligence agencies should have learned from this affair is evident. I was therefore surprised by the assertions of American and Israeli officials I interviewed while researching a recent article on the prospect of an Israeli attack against Iran. They repeatedly stated, "we will know," when we talked about the possibility of Iran's moving to produce nuclear weapons.

This month, playing down reports of disagreements between the United States and Israel, a senior American official said it plainly. "There is day-to-day intelligence cooperation between the United States and Israel," he told me. "If and when the Iranians decide to go over to nuclear weapons production," he added, "we'll know about it and we'll share the information between us."

Today, the two countries agree that Iranians have not begun to assemble a nuclear device, won't do so until their supreme leader gives them a go-ahead, and would need about nine months to create a bomb. Both countries are convinced that they will obtain unequivocal intelligence when the order to start is given.

Here and in Washington, officials assume that as soon as information is received that Iran has moved to build nuclear weapons, Israel will decide to attack its nuclear facilities. Therefore, any exchange of intelligence between Israel and the United States could have far-reaching consequences for the Middle East -- and the world.

In other words, the momentous decision will be driven to an extraordinary extent by intelligence reports. But even though intense focus on Iran's nuclear program has presumably increased the volume of intelligence gathered about it, it remains true that intelligence officers tend to rely heavily on a few trusted sources. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.