The government called for a law requiring Internet service
providers to give all traffic on their networks equal priority,
saying existing rules were insufficient.
The French government on Tuesday called for a law requiring
Internet service providers to give all the traffic on their networks
equal priority, saying existing rules were insufficient for
protecting free speech online and ensuring fair competition among
The proposal would mark a big shift in French policy and a break
with existing European Union practice on the thorny issue of so-
called net neutrality. And though almost certain to meet resistance
from some Internet service providers, it could fuel calls for
similar rules throughout the 27-country European Union.
The issue came to a head in France in January, when one service
provider, Free, temporarily blocked users from seeing advertising
sold by Google until the government ordered Free to restore access.
The proposal, by a French government advisory panel and endorsed
by the minister overseeing digital commerce, pits companies that
build and operate telecommunications systems against Internet
players that rely on the networks to deliver their content to
consumers. The French proposal would still need to be drafted as
legislation and taken up by Parliament.
"I do think that what happens in France could be a test case for
what happens on these tensions globally," said Matthew Howett, an
analyst at Ovum, a telecommunications consulting firm in London.
"There are a lot of countries waiting for someone else to move."
In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission has
sought to impose net neutrality regulations without legislation, but
the initiative has gotten bogged down by legal challenges and other
Google and Free, France's second-largest Internet access
provider, declined to comment on the proposal Tuesday.
Thierry Dieu, a spokesman for the European Telecommunications
Network Operators Association, a lobbying group in Brussels,
declined to comment directly on the French proposal, but he said the
group's members favored a "harmonized" approach across the European
Union, rather than country-by-country legislation.
"For the single telecommunications market in the E.U. and the
certainty of business, this is very important," he said.
Even some free-speech advocates questioned whether the rules
proposed by the advisory panel were at odds with other moves by the
government of the French president, Francois Hollande, to limit hate
speech on Twitter and other social networks.
Until now, the European Union and national administrations in
many of the member countries have said that no new regulations were
necessary to ensure that Internet traffic -- whether simple e-mail
messages or bandwidth-hungry video files -- was treated equitably by
network operators. Telecommunications providers have generally been
permitted to determine which files or traffic get priority during
periods of peak network demand, which they say is essential, given
E.U. regulators in Brussels have said the high level of
competition among Internet service providers was sufficient to
prevent the kinds of abuses feared by advocates of net neutrality
rules. According to the Brussels view, if a telecommunications
company were to cut off access to a certain Web site for political
or business reasons, users could simply move to a rival service.
The French showdown in January between Free and Google involved a
dispute over the carriage of YouTube, Google's video-sharing
service. Free complained that YouTube hogs vast amounts of
bandwidth, forcing the networking company to make big investments in
infrastructure without generating any additional financial benefit
from YouTube's advertising revenue.
At the time, Fleur Pellerin, the French minister overseeing the
digital economy, ordered Free to restore the Google advertisements. …