A longtime columnist for a gun magazine questioned when the
regulation of guns became infringement of the right to bear arms. He
was quickly fired.
The byline of Dick Metcalf, one of the United States' pre-
eminent gun journalists, has gone missing. It has been removed from
Guns & Ammo magazine, where his widely read column once ran on the
back page. He no longer stars on a popular television show about
firearms. Gun companies have stopped flying him around the world and
sending him the latest weapons to review.
In late October, Mr. Metcalf wrote a column that the magazine
titled "Let's Talk Limits," which debated gun laws. "The fact is,"
wrote Mr. Metcalf, who has taught history at Yale and Cornell
University in New York State, "all constitutional rights are
regulated, always have been, and need to be."
The backlash was swift, and fierce. Readers threatened to cancel
their subscriptions. Death threats poured in by email. His
television program was pulled from the air.
Just days after the column appeared, Mr. Metcalf said, his editor
called to tell him that two major gun manufacturers had said "in no
uncertain terms" that they could no longer do business with
InterMedia Outdoors, the company that publishes Guns & Ammo and co-
produces his TV show, if he continued to work there. He was let go
"I've been vanished, disappeared," Mr. Metcalf, 67, said in an
interview last month on his gun range here, about 100 miles north of
St. Louis, surrounded by snow-blanketed fields and towering grain
elevators. "Now you see him. Now you don't."
He is unsure of his next move, but fears he has become a pariah
in the gun industry, to which, he said, he has devoted nearly his
entire adult life.
His experience sheds light on the close-knit world of gun
journalism, where editors and reporters say there is little room for
nuance in the debate over gun laws. Moderate voices that might
broaden the discussion from within are silenced. When writers stray
from the party line promoting an absolutist view of an unfettered
right to bear arms, their publications -- often under pressure from
advertisers -- excommunicate them.
"We are locked in a struggle with powerful forces in this country
who will do anything to destroy the Second Amendment," said Richard
Venola, a former editor of Guns & Ammo. "The time for ceding some
rational points is gone."
There have been other cases like Mr. Metcalf's. In 2012, Jerry
Tsai, the editor of Recoil magazine, wrote that the Heckler & Koch
MP7A1 gun, designed for law enforcement, was "unavailable to
civilians and for good reason." He was pressured to step down, and
despite apologizing, has not written since. In 2007, Jim Zumbo, by
then the author of 23 hunting books, wrote a blog post for Outdoor
Life's website suggesting that military-style rifles were
"terrorist" weapons, best avoided by hunters. His writing,
television and endorsement deals were quickly put on hiatus.
Garry James, a senior editor at Guns & Ammo, said in a phone
interview several weeks ago that its readers were the magazine's
main concern and its editorial independence was not at risk. But, he
added, "advertisers obviously always have power, and you always feel
some pressure." He declined to discuss Mr. Metcalf's matter
specifically, and the company did not respond to further phone calls
and emails seeking comment on other aspects of the operation.
Mr. Metcalf said he was told that advertisers feared customers
would boycott their products if they continued to advertise on TV
shows and magazines featuring his work.
Two major advertisers with InterMedia are the gun companies Ruger
and the Remington Arms Company. …