Newspaper article

Older Minnesotans Live Longer and Healthier Than People in Most Other States

Newspaper article

Older Minnesotans Live Longer and Healthier Than People in Most Other States

Article excerpt

If you're thinking of leaving Minnesota when you retire, then you may want to browse through a new report by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) before you sell your house and hire the moving van.

The report takes a state-by-state look not only at life expectancy for people at age 65, but also at healthy life expectancy for people at that age -- in other words, at how many more years they can expect to live in good health.

And, overall, Minnesota fared well. We scored fifth out of the 50 states and the District of Columbia on life expectancy and third on healthy life expectancy.

Minnesotans can expect to live an average of 20.1 years after age 65, of which 15.6 can be expected to be healthy, according to the report. That compares to 20.4/15.4 years in Florida and 20.2/15.0 years in Arizona, two popular retirement destinations.

It also compares with 19.5/14.9 years in our neighbor to the east, Wisconsin.

Actually, if it's warm weather and a long and healthy life you're looking for, then the best state for growing old in would be Hawaii, where people aged 65 live an average of 21.3 more years, of which 16.2 can be expected to be healthy.

The only other state that beat out Minnesota on both measurements -- life expectancy and healthy life expectancy -- was Connecticut (20.2/15.7).

But growing old in Minnesota is not so great for blacks. In 15 other states, including Wisconsin, blacks can expect to live longer in good health than here in the North Star State.

A serious purpose

Of course, the report isn't meant to be a retirement guide. It was designed to set up a baseline of data that individual states could use to monitor the health status of their older populations. Although national healthy life expectancy estimates -- ones that consider quality as well as quantity of life -- have been configured before, this is the first time that such estimates have been made at the state level.

For the study, which uses 2007-2009 data from three government sources, the CDC researchers specifically looked at disparities in health status by sex, race and state. The race category included only whites and blacks because there wasn't enough reliable data available at the state level for Hispanics, Asians or American Indians/Alaska Natives. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.