Newspaper article Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA)

We Work for the Government and We Just Want to Help ... Ourselves

Newspaper article Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA)

We Work for the Government and We Just Want to Help ... Ourselves

Article excerpt

Hello. We're from the government. We're here to take lots of your money -- about a third more than we took in 1985 -- and to boss you around. We can say you can't build on your own property without our permission. You must buy health insurance if we tell you to.

Federal spending has risen 23 percent since the recession began and median household income has fallen. We're richer. You're poorer. But to pamper ourselves at lavish conferences, give bonuses to IRS executives who harass conservatives and pay for the president's entourage during his vacations, we must have more.

You whine that government programs rarely deliver what we promised and cost more than we said.

So what? When a major study in Oregon concluded the $450 billion spent annually on Medicaid "generated no significant improvement in measured physical health outcomes," hardly anyone in Washington got upset. Or even noticed.

We measure success not by whether a program works, but by how many administer it and how much we are paid. Compared to you, we're paid a lot. Our compensation packages on average are roughly double those of workers in the private sector.

The Department of Health and Human Services found that by the end of the first grade, there was essentially no difference between children who attended the Head Start program and kids who didn't, so some of you said Head Start is a failure. For us it is a success, because after the report came out, the president, citing longer term benefits, raised funding for Head Start from $6.8 billion to $9.2 billion.

The federal government spent about $670 billion last year on 126 programs to alleviate poverty, according to a Cato Institute study - - nearly $15,000 for each officially poor man, woman and child. Since the poverty line for a family of three was $18,530, that should have been enough to wipe out poverty more than twice over. But the poverty rate is now the highest it's been since 1965.

This is mostly because people who aren't poor are eligible for many programs. But it isn't for the benefit of the poor we have 126 different programs. Much of what is spent goes to us, the middlemen.

We've spent more than twice as much on the "War on Poverty" as on all of America's real wars combined, according to Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation, but the poverty rate isn't much below what it was when we started. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.