Newspaper article Roll Call

Getting in the Queue ; People Line Up for Government Jobs Offering Better Pay and Job Security Than the Private Sector

Newspaper article Roll Call

Getting in the Queue ; People Line Up for Government Jobs Offering Better Pay and Job Security Than the Private Sector

Article excerpt

As a resident scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, Andrew Biggs studies one of the most contentious issues: the pay differential between public-sector and private-sector employees.

In an interview with Roll Call, he argues that an across-the- board pay freeze simply isn't enough to close the gap between the two groups and says demand is much greater on the public side than the private.

Q: Why do public-sector employees have greater job security than private-sector employees?

A: There's a variety of different reasons for it. One is that ... because the government is not as cyclical as other businesses, there may be less need to hire or lay off. I tend to think the bigger factor is the power of public employees.

Q: Is there anything the private sector can do in both the short term and long term to compete with the public sector in the areas of wages, benefits and job security?

A: Well, it's very, very hard. The private sector competes best on wages because wages are the place where compensation in the public sector is most comparable to the private sector. It's in the area of benefits and job security where things are really very, very different. Pensions are much more generous in the public sector, in part because they have accounting standards that are a lot looser than private-sector firms have to work with. The solution to that is ... to make public-sector plans use accounting standards that make sense. In terms of job security, I don't think that's something where the private sector should try to compete with the public sector.

Q: In your study last year, "Comparing Federal and Private Sector Compensation," you noted that the federal premium shrinks considerably for higher-level employees in the public sector. Why?

A: Most studies find ... that pay is most generous at the lower levels of skill and less generous at the high levels. Politically speaking, there's a limit on how low the wages can be in the public sector because it just sort of looks bad. And likewise, there's a limit on how high the wages can be because that also looks bad. This comes down to what the typical voter is going to approve of.

Q: Could you explain the Pay Agent Approach? And why, if at all, you're critical of using it as a metric to compare the pay between the two sectors?

A: The standard approach for these types of pay comparisons is that you focus on the employee. ... You use the attributes of the individual to try and predict what the wages are and that's how most economists see this. ... The Pay Agent Approach doesn't think about employees, it thinks about jobs. ... The Pay Agent also doesn't include benefits. ... For both federal [and] state and local workers, it's in the benefits where the action is.

Q: Do you think an across-the-board pay freeze for public-sector employees is enough to level the playing field? …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.