Newspaper article Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA)

Questions Raised about Intellectual Property Rights at Pitt

Newspaper article Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA)

Questions Raised about Intellectual Property Rights at Pitt

Article excerpt

The University of Pittsburgh is telling all faculty and nonclerical staff they must sign agreements stating they "irrevocably assign and transfer to the university my rights, title and interest to all intellectual property" they develop while employed there.

The administration says the agreements simply reflect existing campus intellectual property policies and that the signatures have become necessary to obtain federal research funding because of a 2011 Supreme Court case that Pitt says requires schools not only to have policies but also confirmation that employees will abide by them.

But an official with the American Association of University Professors, which has seen a number of agreements drafted by schools since the Stanford vs. Roche decision, said Wednesday such signatures are not a requirement to secure grant funding. Forcing faculty to sign them is a violation of academic freedom, said Cary Nelson, AAUP's immediate past president.

"Everyone says your academic freedom gives you the right to decide which kind of research you do," Mr. Nelson said. "Your academic freedom doesn't end when you create something valuable. It extends to how that [research] enters the world."

At Pitt, where a research team filed a federal lawsuit in January against the university over intellectual property rights, some expressed concern about the agreement's wording, the sudden urgency to respond to a Supreme Court decision 3 years old and whether the agreements actually go beyond the university's policies.

Those worries surfaced this week at a meeting of Pitt's faculty assembly, which approved a resolution from the Tenure and Academic Freedom Committee urging the offices of Provost Patricia Beeson and Chancellor Patrick Gallagher to delay a Sept. 16 deadline for signatures to be collected.

The committee is seeking more time to work with the administration to study the ramifications.

"If it is determined that the present intellectual property agreement exceeds federal requirements, then the [agreement] will be redrafted with faculty input and incorporated into university policies," the resolution read in part. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.