Newspaper article The Topeka Capital-Journal

Michael Gerson: Corporate Irresponsibility over GMOs

Newspaper article The Topeka Capital-Journal

Michael Gerson: Corporate Irresponsibility over GMOs

Article excerpt

Pass any Chipotle these days and you will see signs claiming credit for removing ingredients that contain GMOs (genetically modified organisms) from the menu. It is the first big chain to do so. The business press has pronounced it "a savvy move to impress millennials."

This milestone in the history of fast-food scruples (and of advertising) is a noteworthy cultural development: the systematic incorporation of anti-scientific attitudes into corporate branding strategies. There is no credible evidence ingesting a plant that has been genetically modified in a lab has a different health outcome than ingesting a plant that has been slowly genetically modified through selective breeding. The National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the World Health Organization have concluded GMOs are safe to eat.

Yet Whole Foods promises "full GMO transparency" by 2018. But you will search it in vain for any explanation of how or why GMOs are harmful, because an actual assertion would not withstand scrutiny.

Chipotle's Co-CEO Steve Ells set out his rationale this way: "They say these ingredients are safe, but I think we all know we'd rather have food that doesn't contain them."

"They" say. "We" know. It brought to mind an argument by Dan Kahan of Yale in the journal Nature concerning global warming. If you are, say, a Republican in the Deep South, your capacity to confront global climate disruption directly is vanishingly small (assuming you think it is a problem). And the cost of bucking your neighbors on the issue may be considerable. They are likely to view you as an oddity or a turncoat.

So the decision to conform to the views of your cultural group or team, while not heroic, is not irrational.

"The trouble starts," says Kahan, "when this communication environment fills up with toxic partisan meanings -- ones that effectively announce that, 'If you are one of us, believe this; otherwise, we'll know you are one of them. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.