A Finnish study found that three out of four patients who took
antibiotics to treat appendicitis, instead of having surgery,
recovered easily.
CORRECTION APPENDED
For more than 100 years, the standard treatment for appendicitis
has been surgery. Now a large Finnish study provides the best
evidence to date that most patients can be treated with antibiotics
alone.
The study, published on Tuesday in JAMA, the Journal of the
American Medical Association, involved 530 patients ages 18 to 60
who agreed to have their treatment -- antibiotics or surgery --
decided at random.
Three out of four who took antibiotics recovered easily, the
researchers found: The pain vanished, and they went on with their
lives. And none who had surgery after taking antibiotics were worse
off for having waited.
"The time has come to consider abandoning routine appendectomy
for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis," Dr. Edward H.
Livingston, a surgeon and editor at the journal, who was not
involved with the study, wrote in an editorial accompanying the
report.
The study comes amid growing questions about the routine use of
surgery to treat appendicitis, which strikes about 300,000 Americans
a year, afflicting one out of 10 adults.
The new results apply only to uncomplicated appendicitis, said
Dr. Paulina Salminen, a surgeon at Turku University Hospital in
Finland and lead author of the new study. She and her colleagues
excluded the 20 percent of patients with complicated cases -- people
with perforated appendices or abdominal abscesses, and those with a
little, rock-like blockage of the appendix called an appendicolith.
To distinguish the complicated from the uncomplicated cases, the
Finnish doctors used CT scans, which, Dr. Livingston said, are
"almost perfect for diagnosis."
But Dr. Philip S. Barie, a surgeon at Weill Cornell Medical
College in New York, noted that antibiotics were not sufficient for
more than a quarter of the patients in the new study and said the
failure rate was unacceptable.
Patients should have the simple and safe operation to remove
their appendix, he said, taking care of the problem quickly and
permanently.
Dr. Livingston disagreed. When he saw the results, he said in an
interview, his first thought was, "Wow. I've been waiting for this."
Dr. Livingston began wondering about the role of surgery 10 years
ago when he operated on a young man with appendicitis who
experienced a rocky recovery. The case prompted him to review the
medical literature.
He found that much of the original research was done by a
surgeon, Dr. Reginald H. Fitz, who in 1886 investigated why people
die from pelvic infections.
Dr. Fitz looked at autopsy reports and found many patients whose
appendices had been inflamed. That led him to conclude that the
appendix may become injured, then infected, then gangrenous;
finally, he theorized, a lethal infection spreads through the
pelvis. …