Newspaper article Roll Call

Senators Running for President Defend the Filibuster

Newspaper article Roll Call

Senators Running for President Defend the Filibuster

Article excerpt

If using the nuclear option to repeal Obamacare becomes a GOP litmus test, then the Republican senators running for president will have a problem.

Both Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina have told conservative talk radio host Hugh Hewitt some variation of no way, no how to the idea of ending the 60-vote threshold for filibusters of legislation.

"Absolutely not. I would never vote to change the filibuster for Obamacare or anything else, because it served the country well," Graham said last week. "But what I would do is use reconciliation, the budget process that they used to pass Obamacare, to repeal Obamacare. But I wouldn't change the Senate rules. Reconciliation only requires a majority vote if it's in with the context of the budget. That's how they passed Obamacare with 51 votes."

That put him squarely in line with Cruz, who has been consistent on the point since being asked about it by CQ Roll Call back in January.

Florida Republican Marco Rubio is with them too, it seems.

"Senator Rubio is open to discussing all options to repeal Obamacare, but believes that the filibuster has been an important tool in stopping Democrats' efforts to expand government," spokeswoman Brooke Sammon said in a statement.

Attempts to solicit a response to the question from the campaign of Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., were unsuccessful over the Independence Day recess.

Within the Senate Republican Conference, there's broad support for maintaining the legislative filibuster, though there is more support for putting the simple majority requirement to limit debate for most executive and judicial nominations into the Senate rules, and there's a debate about whether to apply that to future nominees to the Supreme Court.

Current Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., made the change to the handling of nominations by setting a new precedent, rather than by changing the underlying rules. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.