With the United States losing its share of the world market in
manufacturing, mining, and agriculture, what is the job outlook for
the labor force through the end of the century?
To answer that question, the U.S. Labor Department commissioned
the Hudson Institute, a think tank based in Indianapolis, to
undertake research on employment, income, and occupational trends.
In ``Workforce 2000,'' the institute's published volume on its
findings, the most striking conclusion is that, even though the
average standard of living will be rising, income distribution will
widen as jobs for the least-skilled members of the labor force
shrink and jobs for the most skilled grow rapidly.
The changes ahead are likely to intensify social and political
tensions in the country.
The study estimates that 25 million entrants to the labor force
will be needed by the year 2000. Most of these will be non-white,
female, or immigrant workers. Native white males, who now
constitute 47 percent of the labor force, will account for only 15
percent of the entrants to the labor force by the year 2000.
Despite the evidence of economic benefits from immigration,
Hudson found that only 7 percent of native-born Americans polled
favored more immigration.
``It is not unlikely that, over the next 13 years, the political
reaction to these voter attitudes will lead to much more restrictive
and vigorously enforced legislation and to dramatically reduced
immigration flows,'' the report states.
It warns that harsh laws and strict border controls could be the
outcome if a major revolution in Central or South America results in
an explosive rise in the immigrants thronging into the United
But even if no radical border-closing laws are passed, the
report warns, a likely outcome of anti-immigrant emotions will be
greater hostility between Hispanic and black Americans. By the year
2000, it says, the political relationships between the two groups
may resemble those today between blacks and the Irish, Italians and
Hudson expects living standards for most Americans to rise
slowly in the next 13 years. Its ``baseline'' or ``surprise-free''
projection calls for the economy to grow at an average rate of 2.9
percent a year while the rest of the world grows 3.1 percent. This
projection assumes that slow labor force growth is offset by faster
Recognizing the hazards of long-range forecasting, it offers two
- A pessimistic projection of ``world deflation,'' resulting
from a worldwide glut of labor, production capacity in food,
minerals, and manufactured goods.
- An optimistic ``technology boom,'' with the United States
rebounding to productivity growth rates comparable to the first two
decades after World War II and coordinated international monetary,
fiscal, and trade policies smoothing world business cycles and Third
World countries getting back on the growth path. …