A bill to remove the $500,000 cap now in place on state fees charged
for hazardous waste disposal in Oklahoma would provide a revenue
source for pollution clean-up, Oklahoma Sen. Ed Long, D-Garber, said
Meanwhile, the board of directors of the Oklahoma State Chamber
of Commerce and Industry has voted to oppose the bill.
At a State Capitol news conference, Long said his Senate Bill
219 could generate an additional $2.5 million a year to go toward
Oklahoma's 10 percent share of cleanup of federal Superfund sites
and other pollution.
Senate Bill 219 is scheduled for hearing Thursday in the Natural
Resources Committee of the Oklahoma State Senate.
By virtue of 1990 legislation, hazardous waste landfills in
Oklahoma now pay the state $12 a ton for the in-state-generated waste
they accept and $18 a ton for out-of-state-generated waste they
The charges, which are remitted to the state by the disposal
facility and passed on to customers, halt for a specific facility
once they reach a $500,000 total.
Therefore, individual customers do not end up paying $12 or $18
a ton for waste disposal because their cost is averaged among total
customers, whose tonnage far exceeds the amount that would generate
In addition to removing the $500,000 cap, Long's bill would
raise the out-of-state tonnage charge from $18 to $30.
Gary McCuistion, director of community affairs for U.S.
Pollution Control Inc. in Houston, said last week that such a law
would probably result in customers being charged according to the
fee schedule, instead of the pro rata method now used.
U.S. Pollution Control, formerly based in Oklahoma City,
operates the Lone Mountain Controlled Industrial Waste Facility, the
major hazardous waste landfill in Oklahoma.
The company also operates the USPCI Hydrocarbon Recovery
Services recycling facility in Tulsa.
The hazardous waste disposal fees currently go toward
administering the Controlled Industrial Waste Disposal Act,
developing an inventory of controlled wastes produced in the state
and waste management needs, educational programs, waste reduction
plans for Oklahoma waste generators, and increased inspection of
controlled industrial waste facilities.
The extra money generated by the higher fee schedule in Senate
Bill 219 would be used for the state's share of cleanup of Superfund
pollution sites. It would also go toward response - including
containment and removal - to emergency spillage, leakage or emission
The money would also fund remediation of sites contaminated by
controlled industrial waste in cases where a responsible party could
not be found and made to do it.
Without another revenue source, Oklahoma's 10 percent share of
Superfund site cleanup will come from general revenues, Long said.
The state chamber, however, views the bill as penalizing
companies that are honorable about waste disposal for pollution they
were not responsible for.
"House Bill 1933 called for the money collected through the fee
process to go to the State Health Department program to deal with
hazardous waste, and it was adequate for that," said Ronn Cupp,
chamber vice president for government affairs.
House Bill 1933, signed into law last year, was the measure that
instituted the current hazardous waste disposal fee system.
"If you expand that you are, in effect, punishing current
industries for things that might have been the fault of industries
in the past," Cupp said. …