By Ronda Fears
Journal Record Staff Reporter
A request to suspend a record $92.8 million rate cut and
$148.4 million refund ordered against Southwestern Bell Telephone
Co. pending the outcome of an appeal by Bell is being weighed by
the Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
The threember regulatory panel also is considering a request
to make Bell post a surety bond guaranteed by a third party in
the interim of its appeal of the rate case decision to the
Oklahoma Supreme Court.
Corporation commissioners Bob Anthony, Cody Graves and J.C.
Watts Jr. took the requests under advisement Tuesday, making no
immediate decision in the politically charged rate case.
Anthony had indicated a decision would be made following a
hearing Tuesday that was a continuation from Thursday, but Watts
suggested it be deferred until he could confer with legal
Bell asked that the rate case order, signed Aug. 26, be stayed
until the appeal is decided and offered to post a $250 million
bond with Bell assets as security.
"Our position is the (Oklahoma) constitution doesn't require a
thirdrty surety. Certainly, this commission has never required
that," said Bell attorney Glen Glass.
"There was never going to be any cash paid anyway. Pursuant to
your order, the refund was in the form of a credit" on telephone
bills over a 12-month period, he said.
Moreover, Glass asserted that Bell's assets in Oklahoma,
including its revenue stream, were adequate to cover a $250
million bond, or more. He said the company's assets in Oklahoma
were valued at $1.5 billion, with revenues totaling $800 million
annually. Companywide, he said, Bell has assets of $17.6 billion
and revenues totaling $7.4 billion, which would be attached to
Assistant Oklahoma Attorney General Robert Butkin, however,
countered that there is no assurance that Bell's assets will be
adequate in two years or longer _the anticipated duration of the
"The purpose of the bond, as it is, is to discourage frivolous
appeals," Butkin said.
The Attorney General's Office sought a $350 million bond.
Commission staff advocated a thirdrty bond, but agreed that
$250 million would be adequate for one year while the rate case
was on appeal. Beyond one year, the bond should be revised upward
as necessary, commission staff suggested.
Too, commission staff argued that the entire order should not
be suspended, particularly a portion that orders Bell to make $84
million in network modernizations, mostly in rural Oklahoma over
Oklahoma law requires a thirdrty surety bond, Butkin asserted,
but he said that if Bell is ordered to post a surety bond then
the order should be stayed in its entirety. …