Newspaper article THE JOURNAL RECORD

Corporation Commission

Newspaper article THE JOURNAL RECORD

Corporation Commission

Article excerpt

(12159)

NOTICE OF HEARING

Cause CD No. 165663

Before the Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma.

Applicant: Sonat Exploration Company. Relief Requested: To Amend, Modify, Clarify, Construe, and/or Interpret Pooling Order No. 164375 as Corrected by Order No. 164781. Legal Description: Section 3, Township 15 North, Range 21 West, Roger Mills County, Oklahoma.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Applicant in this cause is requesting that the Commission amend, clarify, construe, and/or interpret Order No. 164375 as corrected by Order No. 164781 which pooled the oil and gas interest of the owners in Section 3, Township 15 North, Range 21 West, Roger Mills County, Oklahoma.

NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Applicant in this Cause is requesting the following special relief:

a. The commission should issue an order in this cause clarifying, construing, and interpreting prior pooling Order No. 164375 as corrected by Order No. 164781 insofar as said orders pooled the interests and adjudicated the rights and equities of the parties subject thereto for the Endicott, Douglas, Tonkawa, Cottage Grove, Oswego, Cleveland, Skinner, and Red Fork formations underlying Section 3, Township 15 North, Range 21 West, Roger Mills County, Oklahoma.

b. Applicant requests that said order clarifying and construing said orders find that Order No. 164375 as corrected by Order No. 164781 validly pooled the interests and adjudicated the rights and equities of the parties subject thereto for the Endicott, Douglas, Tonkawa, Cottage Grove, Oswego, Cleveland, Skinner, and Red Fork formations underlying Section 3, Township 15 North, Range 21 West, Roger Mills County, Oklahoma, for the entire drilling and spacing unit and all wells to be drilled therein for production from such formations and not limited to the initial well bore drilled pursuant to the terms of said order and further find that said orders have continuing effectiveness by virtue of the operations conducted in Section 3.

c. Applicant requests that said Commission issue its Order clarifying, construing, and interpreting the intent of Order No. 164375 as corrected by Order No. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.