Newspaper article The Canadian Press

Critics Question Air Force's Evaluation, Demand More Proof F-35 Is Best Choice: Critics Question Air Force's F-35 Evaluation

Newspaper article The Canadian Press

Critics Question Air Force's Evaluation, Demand More Proof F-35 Is Best Choice: Critics Question Air Force's F-35 Evaluation

Article excerpt

OTTAWA - Internal documents show the air force kicked the tires of two F-35 alternatives, but critics question how hard defence officials looked -- and want the military to provide more justification for its choice of the stealth fighter.

Boeing's Super Hornet and Eurofighter's Typhoon were stacked up against the controversial and not fully tested F-35s, according to a February 2011 slide deck presentation to the chief of air staff.

The Harper government decided in July 2010 to buy the stealth fighter, but has yet to sign a contract.

In the beginning, there were five competitors to the F-35, which was whittled down to two before the final decision was made, documents obtained by The Canadian Press under access to information show.

In calling for a open tender to replace the aging C-18s, opposition parties have alleged no competitors were given serious consideration, a perception NDP procurement critic Matthew Kellway says was reinforced by written answers to questions he posed in the House of Commons.

Responses from Associate Defence Minister Julian Fantino say that between 2005 and 2008, air force planners gathered information among allies and the defence industry.

"I am told that these visits included opportunities for subject matter experts to 'fly' simulators for each of the aircraft considered in order to gain an understanding of the cockpit environment and operational capabilities," Fantino wrote on March 26, 2012.

"I am also told that the gathering of information and analysis continued between 2008 and 2010, including further visits to industry, industry visits to Canada to speak to senior representatives of National Defence and other departments, and the receipt of detailed government-to-government information."

Kellway questions how much research was done beyond flying simulators, which almost anyone with a home computer could have done.

"This government just went through the motions and did minimal consultations with other aircraft-manufacturers to tick of the boxes," said Kellway.

Phil Legasse, a defence expert at the University of Ottawa, said the government and the air force have thrown around undefined terms like "fifth generation," and talked about the different capabilities of aircraft, without answering the most basic questions about the program. …

Author Advanced search

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.