Newspaper article The Canadian Press

What the Jury Didn't Hear about Rafferty Would Have Changed Trial: Tori's Dad: Tori's Dad: Jury Should Hear about Rafferty

Newspaper article The Canadian Press

What the Jury Didn't Hear about Rafferty Would Have Changed Trial: Tori's Dad: Tori's Dad: Jury Should Hear about Rafferty

Article excerpt

LONDON, Ont. - Unnerving evidence barred from court paints a chilling portrait of the man accused of killing eight-year-old Victoria Stafford, one that could have swayed the jury now weighing Michael Rafferty's fate, some involved in the case said Friday.

Troubling details deemed inadmissible by the court were made public Thursday after the nine women and three men of the jury began their deliberations.

Court documents laid bare the contents of Rafferty's laptop computer, which police found was used to search and view child pornography and showed traces of snuff films _ movies depicting real killings.

With the first full day of deliberations underway, Tori's father said the jury should have been allowed to see the "monster" that he believes Rafferty really is.

"The stuff that was excluded would definitely help out the case tremendously," he said Friday. "But I still think the Crown presented a very strong case."

The Crown contends Rafferty masterminded Tori's abduction, rape and murder on April 8, 2009, using his then-girlfriend Terri-Lynne McClintic as a "violent pawn" to fulfil his twisted desires.

McClintic testified that she snatched Tori at Rafferty's urging. McClintic told court he then drove them to a secluded rural area 100 kilometres away where he raped the girl and she was killed.

Rafferty, 31, has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder, kidnapping and sexual assault causing bodily harm.

The defence argues he was an unwilling witness to McClintic's gruesome plans.

Defence lawyer Dirk Derstine recognized Friday the newly released information could have affected the trial's outcome, but said withholding it was necessary.

"It was excluded not for any other reason other than the fact that the Crown's office even conceded that it was illegally seized from Mr. Rafferty," he said.

Superior Court Judge Thomas Heeney refused to allow evidence found on Rafferty's laptop and BlackBerry -- the searches, the evidence of child porn and a downloaded movie about Karla Homolka -- because the search violated Rafferty's charter rights. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.