Newspaper article The Canadian Press

Feds Brush off Budget Watchdog's Legal Opinion on Government Secrecy

Newspaper article The Canadian Press

Feds Brush off Budget Watchdog's Legal Opinion on Government Secrecy

Article excerpt

Feds brush off PBO's findings on gov secrecy

--

OTTAWA - The federal government says it has already provided Parliament's budget watchdog with all the necessary information on the impact of budget cuts, despite a new legal opinion saying government is breaking the law by refusing to cough up more details.

"We have provided financial and economic data in accordance with our understanding of our legal obligations," Raymond Rivet, a spokesman for the Privy Council Office, said in an email statement.

"We have received the legal opinion and will review it."

Budget officer Kevin Page published a legal opinion on Monday saying that 64 federal departments and agencies are breaking the law in their refusal to hand over basic economic and financial information.

While the opinion centres around $5.2 billion in spending cuts announced in the budget, the same reasoning applies to lack of information on previous rounds of spending constraint -- cuts that amount to about $11 billion annually, Page said in an interview.

Without basic details about how the government plans to make ends meet, the parliamentary budget officer said he is not able to do his job and inform MPs about exactly how Ottawa is spending taxpayers' money.

He said only 18 of 82 federal organizations have complied with his request for more details about the fiscal impact of the latest cuts.

"The information should have been provided as requested and both your department and the other departments that have not complied are in violation of the legal obligations under the (Parliament of Canada) Act," Page wrote in a letter to Wayne Wouters, the clerk of the Privy Council.

Wouters is the federal government's top civil servant.

The legal opinion provides the groundwork for challenging the government in Federal Court, but Page said he would prefer if the paperwork acted instead as a catalyst for discussion -- and the quick release of the budget details themselves.

"We hope to get a response back from the public service, from the government, on our legal opinion," Page said in an interview. "Did we craft it right? Have we argued our case correctly? Do they have a different point of view?

"Most importantly, what we hope to get back is the information we requested."

Instead, federal ministers repeatedly pointed to other government reporting mechanisms that they say will provide the necessary details on cuts.

"This prime minister and this government will continue to report to Parliament through the means that have been used for many years. This includes the estimates, the supplementary estimates, quarterly reports and the public accounts," Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird said in the House of Commons.

Page's staffers have gone through every line of those reports and have not been able to piece together a complete accounting of the government plan, or even if there is such a plan. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.